Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34811639›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2022

Ocular Surface Preparation Before Keratoprosthesis Implantation.

Katarzyna Krysik, Piotr Miklaszewski, Dariusz Dobrowolski, Anita Lyssek-Boroń, Beniamin O Grabarek, Edward Wylęgała

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katarzyna KrysikDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine in Zabrze, University of Technology in Katowice, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland.
Piotr MiklaszewskiDepartment of Ophthalmology with Paediatric Unit, 5th Regional Hospital in Sosnowiec, 41-200, Sosnowiec, Poland.
Dariusz DobrowolskiDepartment of Ophthalmology with Paediatric Unit, 5th Regional Hospital in Sosnowiec, 41-200, Sosnowiec, Poland.
Anita Lyssek-BorońDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine in Zabrze, University of Technology in Katowice, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland.
Beniamin O GrabarekDepartment of Histology, Cytophysiology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine in Zabrze, University of Technology in Katowice, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland. bgrabarek7@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1633-7145
Edward WylęgałaChair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Medical Science in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-760, Katowice, Poland.
Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health · PLMedical University of Silesia · PLUniversity of Silesia in Katowice · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to evaluate the surgical treatment results for conjunctival limbal autograft (CLAU) and keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) in various types of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) etiologies performed in order to achieve a stable ocular surface prior to KPro implantation.

methodsWe analyzed the outcomes of the surgical treatment of 43 eyes of 39 patients with LSCD as an initial treatment preparing patients' ocular surface for KPro implantation. The most common causes were ocular trauma (50.7%), mainly alkali burns (77%); autoimmune causes, mainly ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP; 17.4%); infection (15.9%) including Lyell's syndrome/Stevens-Johnson syndrome (LS/SJS; 16%). In all 17 eyes operated on with CLAU, this procedure was performed once. Similarly, one uncomplicated KLAL procedure in one eye was performed in 10 women and 19 men. In another one woman and three men, KLAL was performed in both eyes. In one man with Lyell's syndrome, the KLAL operation was performed three times in one eye. Follow-up was at least 12 months.

resultsVisual acuity (VA) improved in 17 eyes (31%) and remained unchanged in 38 eyes (69%). VA improved from light perception to hand movements in three eyes (16%) from the CLAU group of patients and eight eyes (15%) from the KLAL group; VA improved from hand movements to finger counting in two eyes (12%) post CLAU and two eyes (4%) post KLAL operation. The most common complication of surgical treatment was persistent epithelial defect that was refractory to medical treatment in 32 eyes (58%), 5 eyes post CLAU and 27 post KLAL. Corneal conjunctivalization (19%) and neovascularization (29%) were present on the corneal edge of the graft. Symblephara recurred within 3 months in nine eyes (17.3%) after KLAL, including four eyes that had been chemically burned and five eyes with LS/SJS. DISCUSSION: Pretreatment with CLAU or KLAL procedures in severely damaged ocular surfaces allows the ocular surface to be prepared for safe KPro implantation with sufficient tissue surroundings with less conjunctivalization and deeper conjunctival fornices.

Indexed as

AllograftConjunctival limbal autograftCorneal conjunctivalizationKeratolimbal neovascularizationKeratoprosthesis

Identifiers

PMID34811639
PMCPMC8770772
OpenAlexW3215425079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.