Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34811567›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2022

Safety and efficacy of multipotent adult progenitor cells in acute respiratory distress syndrome (MUST-ARDS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 trial.

G Bellingan, F Jacono, J Bannard-Smith, D Brealey, N Meyer, D Thickett, D Young, A Bentley, B J McVerry, R G Wunderink and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cytokine storm in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. From development to regeneration: the endothelial interface in lung injury and repair.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cell-based Therapies for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Where Are We Now?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: More Questions Than Answers.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

G BellinganIntensive Care Medicine, University College London and supported by NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK. geoff.bellingan1@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4193-4689
F JaconoPulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Bannard-SmithCritical Care and Anaesthesia, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
D BrealeyIntensive Care Medicine, University College London and supported by NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
N MeyerCritical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
D ThickettRespiratory, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
D YoungCritical Care, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
A BentleyCritical Care, South Manchester University Hospital Trust, Manchester, UK.
B J McVerryDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, & Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
R G WunderinkNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
K C DoerschugUniv of Iowa Hosp & Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
C SummersDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
M RojasDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, & Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
A TingAthersys, Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5058-9576
E D JenkinsAthersys, Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA.
Athersys (United States) · USThe Ohio State University · USUCL Biomedical Research Centre · GBCase Western Reserve University · USJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorthwestern University · USUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Technology CoreU19AI135964 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LUIS A. Nunes AMARAL · 2018 to 2026
$24.7M
The Cell Phenotyping and Mouse CoreP01HL154998 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KAREN M RIDGE · 2021 to 2026
$18.9M
Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeR42AA024003 · NIAAA · ATHERSYS, INC. · PI ROJAS, MAURICIO, TING, ANTHONY · 2014 to 2017
$968k
Innovate UK 102165NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL154998NIAAA NIH HHS R42 AA024003NIAAA NIH HHS R42AA024003NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI135964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBone marrow-derived, allogeneic, multipotent adult progenitor cells demonstrated safety and efficacy in preclinical models of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

methodsThis phase 1/2 trial evaluated the safety and tolerability of intravenous multipotent adult progenitor cells in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS in 12 UK and USA centres. Cohorts 1 and 2 were open-label, evaluating acute safety in three subjects receiving 300 or 900 million cells, respectively. Cohort 3 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel trial infusing 900 million cells (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) within 96 h of ARDS diagnosis. Primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included clinical outcomes, quality of life (QoL) and plasma biomarkers.

resultsNo allergic or serious adverse reactions were associated with cell therapy in any cohort. At baseline, the cohort 3 cell group had less severe hypoxia. For cohort 3, 28-day mortality was 25% for cell vs. 45% for placebo recipients. Median 28-day free from intensive care unit (ICU) and ventilator-free days in the cell vs. placebo group were 12.5 (IQR 0,18.5) vs. 4.5 (IQR 0,16.8) and 18.5 (IQR 0,22) vs. 6.5 (IQR 0,18.3), respectively. A prospectively defined severe ARDS subpopulation (PaO

conclusionsMultipotent adult progenitor cells were safe and well tolerated in ARDS. The clinical outcomes warrant larger trials to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and optimal patient population.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeRespiratory Distress SyndromeAdultDouble-Blind MethodHumansIntensive Care UnitsStem CellsTreatment OutcomeAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)Multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPC)Stem cells

Identifiers

PMID34811567
PMCPMC8608557
OpenAlexW3208075008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.