Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34810227›Full record

ArticleRMD open2021

Efficacy and safety of colchicine in COVID-19: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Kedar Gautambhai Mehta, Tejas Patel, Paragkumar D Chavda, Parvati Patel

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Covid-19, an unfinished story.Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kedar Gautambhai MehtaCommunity Medicine, GMERS Medical College Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India kedar_mehta20@yahoo.co.in.ORCID 0000-0003-4374-9495
Tejas PatelPharmacology, AIIMS, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Paragkumar D ChavdaCommunity Medicine, GMERS Medical College Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Parvati PatelCommunity Medicine, GMERS Medical College Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColchicine, an anti-inflammatory drug is prescribed nowadays for COVID-19. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated efficacy and safety of colchicine in patients with COVID-19.

methodsWe searched databases for randomised controlled studies evaluating efficacy and/or safety of colchicine as compared with supportive care in patients with COVID-19. The efficacy outcomes were mortality, ventilatory support, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of hospital stay. The safety outcomes were adverse events, serious adverse events and diarrhoea. A meta-analytical summary was estimated using random effects model through Mantle-Hanzle method. An I

resultsOut of 69 full texts assessed, 6 studies (16148 patients with COVID-19) were included in meta-analysis. Patients receiving colchicine did not show significant reduction in mortality (risk difference, RD -0.00 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.01), I

conclusionThe moderate quality evidence suggests no benefit of addition of colchicine to the standard care regimen in patients with COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19ColchicineHumansSARS-CoV-2Colchicineanti-inflammatory agentsCOVID-19cytokinesnon-steroidal

Identifiers

PMID34810227
PMCPMC8561824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.