Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34810191›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Trajectory research in children on the autism spectrum: a scoping review protocol.

Stephen Gentles, Eric Duku, Connor Kerns, Alana J McVey, Michelle C Hunsche, Elise C Ng Cordell, E Dmitra Bednar, Laura Banfield, Peter Szatmari, Stelios Georgiades

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Trajectory research in children with an autism diagnosis: A scoping review.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stephen GentlesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada stevegentles@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2004-1451
Eric DukuDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Connor KernsDepartment of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Alana J McVeyDepartment of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michelle C HunscheDepartment of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Elise C Ng CordellDepartment of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
E Dmitra BednarMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Laura BanfieldHealth Sciences Library, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Peter SzatmariDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stelios GeorgiadesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLongitudinal trajectory methods, featuring outcome assessments at three or more time points, are increasingly being used as appropriate approaches to understand developmental pathways of people on the autism spectrum across the lifespan. Understanding the scope of this rapidly expanding body of research can help inform future trajectory studies and identify areas for potential meta-analysis as well as key evidence gaps. We present the protocol for a scoping review whose objective is to identify and summarise the scope of research that uses a longitudinal trajectory study design to examine development in children diagnosed with autism. Specifically, we will identify outcome domains and age intervals that have been well characterised, areas where further research is needed and the historical use of various longitudinal trajectory analytical approaches. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We outline the methods for the proposed scoping review according to the framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley, with subsequent clarifications and enhancements by other authors. Using a search strategy developed by a medical librarian, we will search six databases for relevant publications. Titles and abstracts will be screened in duplicate, followed by full-text screening. Data extraction fields developed predominantly a priori from a set of guiding subquestions will be used to chart relevant data. The findings will include quantitative aggregate summaries, narrative summaries, and appraisal of trajectory studies according to our methodological subquestions. We will consult autistic self-advocate and parent-caregiver stakeholders to facilitate interpretation of the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. The results will be presented to researcher, care professional, policy-maker and stakeholder audiences at local and international conferences, other dissemination activities and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderChildDelivery of Health CareHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPeer ReviewResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topicchild & adolescent psychiatrydevelopmental neurology & neurodisabilityepidemiologypaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID34810191
PMCPMC8609941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.