ArticleBMJ open2021
How do healthcare providers construe patient complexity? A qualitative study of multimorbidity in HIV outpatient clinical practice.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caregiver perceptions of the impact and effect of family conferences for patients with complex and high-level palliative care needs: a cross-sectional survey study.BMC palliative care · 2026Observational
- Improving Clinical Patient Activation and Strengthening Health Outcomes: Findings from a Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Missed opportunities in diabetes care: unraveling therapeutic inertia and its predictors in resource-limited settings.Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports · 2025Article
- What makes patients in primary care complex? A scoping review combined with a focus group analysis.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Nurse-Related Complexity of Care Perceived by Critical Care Nurses: A Multicentre Qualitative Study.Nursing in critical care · 2025Article
- Healthy Lives 5 Axis Scale for individuals with complex health and social needs: assessment of validity and reliability.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Advancing health equity for Indigenous peoples in Canada: development of a patient complexity assessment framework.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Complexity of patients with or without infectious disease consultation in tertiary-care hospitals in Germany.Infection · 2024Article
- Experiences of hospital care for people with multiple long-term conditions: a scoping review of qualitative research.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Defining complexity in anaesthesia: description and validation of the Oxford Anaesthetic Complexity (OxAnCo) score.Anaesthesia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient complexity is an increasingly used concept in clinical practice, policy debates and medical research. Yet the literature lacks a clear definition of its meaning and drivers from the health provider's perspective. This shortcoming is problematic for clinical practice and medical education in the light of a rising number of multimorbid patients and the need for future healthcare providers that are adequately trained in treating complex patients.
objectivesTo develop an empirically grounded framework of healthcare providers' perceptions of patient complexity and to characterise the relationship between case complexity, care complexity and provider experience as complexity-contributing factors.
designQualitative study based on semistructured in-depth interviews with healthcare practitioners.
settingA Swiss hospital-based HIV outpatient clinic.
participantsA total of 31 healthcare providers participated. Participants volunteered to take part and comprised 17 nurses, 8 junior physicians (interns) and 6 senior physicians (residents, fellows and attendings).
resultsPerceived patient complexity arises from the combination of case complexity drivers, the provider's perceived controllability, and a set of complexity moderators at the levels of the patient, the care provider and the broader care context. We develop a conceptual framework that outlines key relationships among these complexity-contributing factors and present 10 key questions to help guide medical professionals in making complexity more explicit and more manageable in daily practice.
conclusionsThe framework presented in this study helps to advance a shared understanding of patient complexity. Our findings inform curriculum design and the teaching of essential skills to medical students in areas characterised by high patient complexity such as general internal medicine and geriatrics. From a policy perspective, our findings have important implications for the design of more effective healthcare interventions for complex patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.