Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34810138›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen2021

[How are key resources and key demands associated with nurses' work engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic? A cross-sectional study].

Christina E Bartsch, Lena Dürr, Andrea Forster, Clemens Koob

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Workload and mental health of nursing staff in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic-a scoping review].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina E BartschFakultät für Gesundheit und Pflege, Katholische Stiftungshochschule München, München, Deutschland.
Lena DürrFakultät für Gesundheit und Pflege, Katholische Stiftungshochschule München, München, Deutschland.
Andrea ForsterFakultät für Gesundheit und Pflege, Katholische Stiftungshochschule München, München, Deutschland.
Clemens KoobFakultät für Gesundheit und Pflege, Katholische Stiftungshochschule München, München, Deutschland. Electronic address: clemens.koob@ksh-m.de.
Katholische Stiftungsfachhochschule München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNurses are assigned a key role in pandemic response, with work engagement considered to be pivotal. The job demands-resources theory assumes that work engagement depends on job resources and job demands. Key job resources and demands have already been proposed for nurses. However, there is no evidence on their importance under pandemic conditions. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate their relevance to nurses' work engagement during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsThe study was carried out in a cross-sectional design and addressed nurses in direct health care settings in Germany. Data was collected administering a quantitative online survey using valid and reliable measures during the second wave of the pandemic. A convenience sample was obtained, including the use of social media, randomly selected health care facilities, and all universities with nursing-related programs in Germany. The dataset for analyses comprised a total of 1,027 cases. The sample included nurses of various educational levels and from different sectors. Multiple linear regression analysis after multiple imputation was used to examine the relevance of key resources and demands for work engagement.

resultsKey resources and demands explained 36% of the variance in nurses' work engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Positive associations were found between the key resources of autonomy (β¯ DISCUSSION: The job demands-resources theory is suitable for explaining nurses' work engagement even in times of crisis. Taken together, key resources and demands have a significant influence on nurses' work engagement under pandemic conditions. However, not all so-called key resources and demands actually have a key status in a pandemic.

conclusionAny lack of formal rewards should be countered, professional resources should be sustainably secured, and the autonomy of nurses and their interpersonal relationships should be strengthened. Nursing management decisions should be made not only with the current pandemic but also the post-pandemic period in mind.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19NursesCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansJob SatisfactionPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesWork EngagementWorkloadArbeitsanforderungenArbeitsengagementArbeitsressourcenCoronavirus disease (COVID-19)COVID-19Health care managementJob demandsJob resourcesLeadership in a pandemic contextManagement der PflegePandemiespezifische FührungWork engagement

Identifiers

PMID34810138
PMCPMC8604397
OpenAlexW3216332286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.