Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34809867›Full record

ReviewPET clinics2022

Artificial Intelligence and Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Workflow:: Technologists' Perspective.

Cheryl Beegle, Navid Hasani, Roberto Maass-Moreno, Babak Saboury, Eliot Siegel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PET clinics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Medicine: Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities Toward a Trustworthy Ecosystem.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cheryl BeegleDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Room 1C455, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Navid HasaniDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Room 1C455, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA 70121, USA.
Roberto Maass-MorenoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Room 1C455, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Babak SabouryDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Room 1C455, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore Country, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: babak.saboury@nih.gov.
Eliot SiegelDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, 655 W. Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. Electronic address: Esiegel@umaryland.edu.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance the efficiency of medical imaging quality control and clinical documentation, provide clinical decision support, and increase image acquisition and processing quality. A clear understanding of the basic tenets of these technologies and their impact will enable nuclear medicine technologists to train for performing advanced imaging tasks. AI-enabled medical devices' anticipated role and impact on routine nuclear medicine workflow (scheduling, quality control, check-in, radiotracer injection, waiting room, image planning, image acquisition, image post-processing) is reviewed in this article. With the assistance of AI, newly compiled patient imaging data can be customized to encompass personalized risk assessments of patients' disease burden, along with the development of individualized treatment plans. Nuclear medicine technologists will continue to play a crucial role on the medical team, collaborating with patients and radiologists to improve each patient's imaging experience and supervising the performance of integrated AI applications.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNuclear MedicineHumansPositron-Emission TomographyWorkflowArtificial intelligenceImaging workflowMedical imagingNuclear medicine technologists

Identifiers

PMID34809867
PMCPMC8797670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.