Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34809706›Full record

ArticleBioelectronic medicine2021

Framework for automated sorting of neural spikes from Neuralynx-acquired tetrode recordings in freely-moving mice.

Joshua J Strohl, Joseph T Gallagher, Pedro N Gómez, Joshua M Glynn, Patricio T Huerta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioelectronic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua J StrohlLaboratory of Immune & Neural Networks, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Joseph T GallagherLaboratory of Immune & Neural Networks, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Pedro N GómezLaboratory of Immune & Neural Networks, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Joshua M GlynnLaboratory of Immune & Neural Networks, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Patricio T HuertaLaboratory of Immune & Neural Networks, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA. pato.huerta@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0270-2308

Funding

The Monoclonal Antibody and Reagent CoreP01AI073693 · NIAID · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI Czeslawa Helena Kowal · 2008 to 2026
$45.8M
Targeting cognitive and immune impairment in sepsis survivorsP01AI102852 · NIAID · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI VOLPE, BRUCE THOMAS · 2014 to 2018
$11.5M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI073693NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI102852NIH HHS 5P01AI073693-12NIH HHS 5P01AI102852-05U.S. Department of Defense W81XWH-19-1-0759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtracellular recording represents a crucial electrophysiological technique in neuroscience for studying the activity of single neurons and neuronal populations. The electrodes capture voltage traces that, with the help of analytical tools, reveal action potentials ('spikes') as well as local field potentials. The process of spike sorting is used for the extraction of action potentials generated by individual neurons. Until recently, spike sorting was performed with manual techniques, which are laborious and unreliable due to inherent operator bias. As neuroscientists add multiple electrodes to their probes, the high-density devices can record hundreds to thousands of neurons simultaneously, making the manual spike sorting process increasingly difficult. The advent of automated spike sorting software has offered a compelling solution to this issue and, in this study, we present a simple-to-execute framework for running an automated spike sorter.

methodsTetrode recordings of freely-moving mice are obtained from the CA1 region of the hippocampus as they navigate a linear track. Tetrode recordings are also acquired from the prelimbic cortex, a region of the medial prefrontal cortex, while the mice are tested in a T maze. All animals are implanted with custom-designed, 3D-printed microdrives that carry 16 electrodes, which are bundled in a 4-tetrode geometry.

resultsWe provide an overview of a framework for analyzing single-unit data in which we have concatenated the acquisition system (Cheetah, Neuralynx) with analytical software (MATLAB) and an automated spike sorting pipeline (MountainSort). We give precise instructions on how to implement the different steps of the framework, as well as explanations of our design logic. We validate this framework by comparing manually-sorted spikes against automatically-sorted spikes, using neural recordings of the hippocampus and prelimbic cortex in freely-moving mice.

conclusionsWe have efficiently integrated the MountainSort spike sorter with Neuralynx-acquired neural recordings. Our framework is easy to implement and provides a high-throughput solution. We predict that within the broad field of bioelectronic medicine, those teams that incorporate high-density neural recording devices to their armamentarium might find our framework quite valuable as they expand their analytical footprint.

Indexed as

Automated spike sortingCheetahElectrophysiologyMATLABMountainSortMouseNeuralynxSpike clusteringTetrode

Identifiers

PMID34809706
PMCPMC8609830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.