Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34809667›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2021

Compositional and structural analysis of engineered stones and inorganic particles in silicotic nodules of exposed workers.

Antonio León-Jiménez, José M Mánuel, Marcial García-Rojo, Marina G Pintado-Herrera, José Antonio López-López, Antonio Hidalgo-Molina, Rafael García, Pedro Muriel-Cueto, Nieves Maira-González, Daniel Del Castillo-Otero and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. From Engineered Stone Slab to Silicosis: A Synthesis of Exposure Science and Medical Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio León-JiménezPulmonology, Allergy and Thoracic Surgery Department, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain. antonio.leon.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es.ORCID 0000-0002-0238-9588
José M MánuelIMEYMAT: University Institute of Research in Electron Microscopy and Materials of the University of Cadiz, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.
Marcial García-RojoBiomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain.
Marina G Pintado-HerreraINMAR: University Research Institute of Marine Research, University of Cádiz, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.
José Antonio López-LópezINMAR: University Research Institute of Marine Research, University of Cádiz, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.
Antonio Hidalgo-MolinaPulmonology, Allergy and Thoracic Surgery Department, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain.
Rafael GarcíaIMEYMAT: University Institute of Research in Electron Microscopy and Materials of the University of Cadiz, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.
Pedro Muriel-CuetoBiomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain.
Nieves Maira-GonzálezDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Puerto Real University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain.
Daniel Del Castillo-OteroDepartment of Pulmonology, Puerto Real University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain.
Francisco M MoralesIMEYMAT: University Institute of Research in Electron Microscopy and Materials of the University of Cadiz, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.
Universidad de Cádiz · ESBiomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cadiz · ESHospital Universitario Puerto Real · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngineered stone silicosis is an emerging disease in many countries worldwide produced by the inhalation of respirable dust of engineered stone. This silicosis has a high incidence among young workers, with a short latency period and greater aggressiveness than silicosis caused by natural materials. Although the silica content is very high and this is the key factor, it has been postulated that other constituents in engineered stones can influence the aggressiveness of the disease. Different samples of engineered stone countertops (fabricated by workers during the years prior to their diagnoses), as well as seven lung samples from exposed patients, were analyzed by multiple techniques.

resultsThe different countertops were composed of SiO

conclusionSome of the volatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and metals detected in the studied countertop samples have been described as causative of lung inflammation and respiratory disease. Among inorganic constituents, aluminum has been a relevant component within the silicotic nodule, reaching atomic concentrations even higher than silicon in some cases. Such concentrations, both for silicon and aluminum showed a decreasing tendency from the center of the nodule towards its frontier.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureSilicosisAdultDustHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuartzSilicon DioxideDustQuartzSilicon DioxideAluminumArtificial stoneEngineered stoneQuartz agglomerateSilicaSilicosisVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID34809667
PMCPMC8607701
OpenAlexW3216366943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.