Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34809628›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Suture button versus syndesmotic screw in ankle fractures - evaluation with 3D imaging-based measurements.

Robert Hennings, Firas Souleiman, Martin Heilemann, Mareike Hennings, Alexis Klengel, Georg Osterhoff, Pierre Hepp, Annette B Ahrberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert Hennings *Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. robert.hennings@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9936-5979
Firas Souleiman *Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1087-7503
Martin HeilemannZESBO - Centre for Research on Musculoskeletal Systems, University of Leipzig, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5611-7476
Mareike HenningsDepartment of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Alexis KlengelDepartment of Radiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5182-4884
Georg OsterhoffDepartment of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5051-0998
Pierre HeppDepartment of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6510-2943
Annette B AhrbergDepartment of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9083-4505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInadequate reduction of syndesmotic injuries can result in disabling clinical outcomes. The aim of the study was to compare syndesmosis congruity after fixation by syndesmotic screws (SYS) or a suture button system (SBS) using three-dimensional (3D) computed imaging techniques.

methodsIn a retrospective single-center study, patients with unilateral stabilization of an ankle fracture with a syndesmotic injury and post-operative bilateral CT scans were analyzed using a recently established 3D method. The side-to-side differences were compared for tibio-fibular clear space (∆CS), translation angle (∆α), and vertical offset (∆z) among patients stabilized with syndesmotic screws or suture button system. Syndesmotic malreduction was defined for ∆CS > 2 mm and for |∆α| > 5°. ∆CS and ∆α were correlated with two-dimensional (2D) measurements.

resultsEighteen patients stabilized with a syndesmosis screw and 29 stabilized with a suture button system were analyzed. After stabilization, both groups revealed mild diastasis (SYS: mean ∆CS 0.3 mm, SD 1.1 mm vs SBS: mean ∆CS 0.2 mm, SD 1.2 mm, p = 0.710). In addition, both stabilization methods showed slight dorsalization of the fibula (SYS: mean ∆α 0.5°, SD 4.6° vs SBS: mean ∆α 2.1°, SD 3.7°, p = 0.192). Also, restoration of the fibula-to-tibia length ratio also did not differ between the two groups (SYS: mean Δz of 0.5 mm, SD 2.4 mm vs SBS: mean Δz of 0 mm, SD 1.2 mm; p = 0.477). Malreduction according to high ∆α was most common (26% of cases), with equal distribution between the groups (p = 0.234). ∆CS and ∆α showed good correlation with 2D measurements (ρ = 0.567; ρ = 0.671).

conclusionThis in vivo analysis of post-operative 3D models showed no differences in immediate post-operative alignment after syndesmotic screws or suture button system. Special attention should be paid to syndesmotic malreduction in the sagittal orientation of the fibula in relation to the tibia in radiological control of the syndesmotic congruity as well as intra-operatively.

Indexed as

Ankle FracturesAnkle JointBone ScrewsFracture Fixation, InternalHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalRetrospective StudiesSuturesSuture Techniques3D imaging3D measurementSuture buttonSyndesmosisSyndesmotic screwTibio-fibular

Identifiers

PMID34809628
PMCPMC8609744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.