Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34809608›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2021

Prognostication of neurologic outcome using gray-white-matter-ratio in comatose patients after cardiac arrest.

Konrad Kirsch, Stefan Heymel, Albrecht Günther, Kathleen Vahl, Thorsten Schmidt, Dominik Michalski, Michael Fritzenwanger, Paul Christian Schulze, Rüdiger Pfeifer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Konrad KirschDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. Konrad.Kirsch@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0398-1943
Stefan HeymelDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Division of Medical Intensive Care, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Albrecht GüntherDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Kathleen VahlDepartment of Radiology, Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Klinikum Altenburger Land, Am Waldessaum 10, 04600, Altenburg, Germany.
Thorsten SchmidtDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Heusnerstraße 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
Dominik MichalskiDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael FritzenwangerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Division of Medical Intensive Care, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Paul Christian SchulzeDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Rüdiger PfeiferDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Division of Medical Intensive Care, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DEHelios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal · DEKlinikum Altenburger Land · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to assess the prognostic value regarding neurologic outcome of CT neuroimaging based Gray-White-Matter-Ratio measurement in patients after resuscitation from cardiac arrest.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated CT neuroimaging studies of 91 comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest and 46 non-comatose controls. We tested the diagnostic performance of Gray-White-Matter-Ratio compared with established morphologic signs of hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury, e. g. loss of distinction between gray and white matter, and laboratory parameters, i. e. neuron-specific enolase, for the prediction of poor neurologic outcomes after resuscitated cardiac arrest. Primary endpoint was neurologic function assessed with cerebral performance category score 30 days after the index event.

resultsGray-White-Matter-Ratio showed encouraging interobserver variability (ICC 0.670 [95% CI: 0.592-0.741] compared to assessment of established morphologic signs of hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury (Fleiss kappa 0.389 [95% CI: 0.320-0.457]) in CT neuroimaging studies. It correlated with cerebral performance category score with lower Gray-White-Matter-Ratios associated with unfavourable neurologic outcomes. A cut-off of 1.17 derived from the control population predicted unfavourable neurologic outcomes in adult survivors of cardiac arrest with 100% specificity, 50.3% sensitivity, 100% positive predictive value, and 39.3% negative predictive value. Gray-White-Matter-Ratio prognostic power depended on the time interval between circulatory arrest and CT imaging, with increasing sensitivity the later the image acquisition was executed.

conclusionsA reduced Gray-White-Matter-Ratio is a highly specific prognostic marker of poor neurologic outcomes early after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Sensitivity seems to be dependent on the time interval between circulatory arrest and image acquisition, with limited value within the first 12 h.

Indexed as

Heart ArrestWhite MatterAdultComaHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCardiopulmonary resuscitationComaHeart arrestHypoxia-ischemia, brainNeuroimagingPredictive value of testsPrognosisRetrospective studies

Identifiers

PMID34809608
PMCPMC8607613
OpenAlexW3217466832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.