Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34808015›Full record

ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2022

5S-IGS rDNA in wind-pollinated trees (Fagus L.) encapsulates 55 million years of reticulate evolution and hybrid origins of modern species.

Simone Cardoni, Roberta Piredda, Thomas Denk, Guido W Grimm, Aristotelis C Papageorgiou, Ernst-Detlef Schulze, Anna Scoppola, Parvin Salehi Shanjani, Yoshihisa Suyama, Nobuhiro Tomaru and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Quaternary Radiation of Spring Ephemerals.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Simone CardoniDepartment of Agricultural and Forestry Science (DAFNE), Università degli studi della Tuscia, Viterbo, 01100, Italy.
Roberta PireddaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Valenzano, 70010, Italy.
Thomas DenkSwedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, 10405, Sweden.
Guido W GrimmUnaffiliated, Orléans, France.
Aristotelis C PapageorgiouDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Ernst-Detlef SchulzeMax-Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, 07701, Germany.
Anna ScoppolaDepartment of Agricultural and Forestry Science (DAFNE), Università degli studi della Tuscia, Viterbo, 01100, Italy.
Parvin Salehi ShanjaniNatural Resources Gene Bank, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran.
Yoshihisa SuyamaGraduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Osaki, Miyagi, 989-6711, Japan.
Nobuhiro TomaruGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8601, Japan.
James R P WorthEcological Genetics Laboratory, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8687, Japan.
Marco Cosimo SimeoneDepartment of Agricultural and Forestry Science (DAFNE), Università degli studi della Tuscia, Viterbo, 01100, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3798-9580
Università degli Studi della Tuscia · ITAgricultural Research & Education Organization · IRDemocritus University of Thrace · GRForestry and Forest Products Research Institute · JPMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry · DENagoya University · JPSwedish Museum of Natural History · SETohoku University · JPUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard models of plant speciation assume strictly dichotomous genealogies in which a species, the ancestor, is replaced by two offspring species. The reality in wind-pollinated trees with long evolutionary histories is more complex: species evolve from other species through isolation when genetic drift exceeds gene flow; lineage mixing can give rise to new species (hybrid taxa such as nothospecies and allopolyploids). The multi-copy, potentially multi-locus 5S rDNA is one of few gene regions conserving signal from dichotomous and reticulate evolutionary processes down to the level of intra-genomic recombination. Therefore, it can provide unique insights into the dynamic speciation processes of lineages that diversified tens of millions of years ago. Here, we provide the first high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of the 5S intergenic spacers (5S-IGS) for a lineage of wind-pollinated subtropical to temperate trees, the Fagus crenata - F. sylvatica s.l. lineage, and its distant relative F. japonica. The observed 4963 unique 5S-IGS variants reflect a complex history of hybrid origins, lineage sorting, mixing via secondary gene flow, and intra-genomic competition between two or more paralogous-homoeologous 5S rDNA lineages. We show that modern species are genetic mosaics and represent a striking case of ongoing reticulate evolution during the past 55 million years.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPollinationDNA, IntergenicDNA, RibosomalFagusGene FlowHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 5STreesWindDNA, IntergenicDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 5S5S rDNAadaptationFagusgenetic diversityhigh-throughput sequencinghybrid evolutionwind-pollination

Identifiers

PMID34808015
PMCPMC9299691
OpenAlexW3215785205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.