ArticlePloS one2021
Differences in the clinical characteristics of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis according to spirometric impairment.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A retrospective study exploring chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in post-tuberculosis lung disease patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Risk of incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during longitudinal follow-up in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease.Respiratory research · 2024Article
- Analysis of clinical characteristics of different types of lung function impaiement in TDL patients.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of Respiratory Bacterial Findings on Patients with Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis.International journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: comprehensive insights into epidemiology, treatment, and unresolved challenges.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical features by declining lung function remain uncharacterized in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) patients. We investigated the clinical characteristics of CPA patients based on spirometric impairments (restrictive spirometric pattern [RSP] and obstructive spirometric pattern [OSP]) and their severity. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of CPA patients who underwent pulmonary function tests from March 2017 to February 2020. We used Global Lung Initiative 2012 equations with lower limit of normal. The clinical characteristics of patients with RSP were compared to those with OSP. Additionally, RSP patients' characteristics were analyzed according to forced vital capacity (FVC) tertile, and OSP patients' characteristics were analyzed according to forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) tertile. Among the 112 patients with CPA (52 [46%] with RSP and 60 [54%] with OSP), body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in patients with RSP than in those with OSP (17.6 kg/m2 versus 20.3 kg/m2; P = 0.003), and non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease was more frequently observed in patients with RSP than in those with OSP (28.8% versus 11.7%; P = 0.004). Additionally, for patients with RSP, younger age and bilateral pulmonary lesions were more frequently observed in the first tertile group than in the other groups (P for trend: 0.025 and 0.001, respectively). For patients with OSP, low BMI, paracavitary infiltrates, and elevated WBC count were more frequently observed in the first tertile group than in the other groups (P for trend: < 0.001, 0.011, and 0.041, respectively). Differences in the clinical features of CPA patients were identified according to heterogeneous spirometric patterns and their severity. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical significance of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.