Trial reportPloS one2021
Portable eye-tracking as a reliable assessment of oculomotor, cognitive and reaction time function: Normative data for 18-45 year old.
Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Portable eye-tracking in neurology: current uses and future perspectives in cognition.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Pooled it
- Eye-tracking phenotypes reveal clinically meaningful heterogeneity of attention and executive control dysfunction after stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Advances in ocular motor and pupil biomarkers for neurological disorders.Brain communications · 2026Review
- Effects of Oculomotor Scanning on Agility Performance: Gender and a Type of Team Sport Comparison.Journal of human kinetics · 2025Article
- Traumatic Brain Injury: Novel Experimental Approaches and Treatment Possibilities.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Oculomotor, vestibular, reaction time, and cognitive (OVRT-C) responses in 7- to 17-year-old children.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Age-Based Developmental Biomarkers in Eye Movements: A Retrospective Analysis Using Machine Learning.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Exercise Intolerance After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Occurs in All Subtypes in the Adult Population.Journal of neurotrauma · 2024Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of a modularized, virtual-reality-based automated pupillometer for detection of relative afferent pupillary defect in unilateral optic neuropathies.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2024Article
- SARS-CoV-2 Infection Impairs Oculomotor Functions: A Longitudinal Eye-tracking Study.Journal of eye movement research · 2024Article
- Advancements in eye movement measurement technologies for assessing neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Review
- Long-Term Effects of Low-Level Blast Exposure and High-Caliber Weapons Use in Military Special Operators.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Implementing New Technologies to Improve Visual-Spatial Functions in Patients with Impaired Consciousness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Oculomotor, vestibular, reaction time, and cognitive tests as objective measures of neural deficits in patients post COVID-19 infection.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Vestibular and balance function in veterans with chronic dizziness associated with mild traumatic brain injury and blast exposure.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Objective oculomotor, vestibular, reaction time, and cognitive signatures of vestibular migraine.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- The Effects of Chronic Substance Misuse on the Auditory and Vestibular Systems: Preliminary Findings.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Eye movements measured by high precision eye-tracking technology represent a sensitive, objective, and non-invasive method to probe functional neural pathways. Oculomotor tests (e.g., saccades and smooth pursuit), tests that involve cognitive processing (e.g., antisaccade and predictive saccade), and reaction time tests have increasingly been showing utility in the diagnosis and monitoring of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in research settings. Currently, the adoption of these tests into clinical practice is hampered by a lack of a normative data set. The goal of this study was to construct a normative database to be used as a reference for comparing patients' results. Oculomotor, cognitive, and reaction time tests were administered to male and female volunteers, aged 18-45, who were free of any neurological, vestibular disorders, or other head injuries. Tests were delivered using either a rotatory chair equipped with video-oculography goggles (VOG) or a portable virtual reality-like VOG goggle device with incorporated infrared eye-tracking technology. Statistical analysis revealed no effects of age on test metrics when participant data were divided into pediatric (i.e.,18-21 years, following FDA criteria) and adult (i.e., 21-45 years) groups. Gender (self-reported) had an effect on auditory reaction time, with males being faster than females. Pooled data were used to construct a normative database using 95% reference intervals (RI) with 90% confidence intervals on the upper and lower limits of the RI. The availability of these RIs readily allows clinicians to identify specific metrics that are deficient, therefore aiding in rapid triage, informing and monitoring treatment and/or rehabilitation protocols, and aiding in the return to duty/activity decision. This database is FDA cleared for use in clinical practice (K192186).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.