Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34807915›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Validation of a novel molecular assay to the diagnostic of COVID-19 based on real time PCR with high resolution melting.

Beatriz Iandra da Silva Ferreira, Natália Lins da Silva-Gomes, Wagner Luis da Costa Nunes Pimentel Coelho, Vanessa Duarte da Costa, Vanessa Cristine de Souza Carneiro, Rafael Lopes Kader, Marisa Pimentel Amaro, Lívia Melo Villar, Fábio Miyajima, Soniza Vieira Alves-Leon and 3 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Beatriz Iandra da Silva FerreiraReal Time PCR Platform RPT09A, Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Endemic Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Institute/ Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Natália Lins da Silva-GomesReal Time PCR Platform RPT09A, Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Endemic Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Institute/ Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Wagner Luis da Costa Nunes Pimentel CoelhoLaboratory of Technological Development in Virology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute/ Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Vanessa Duarte da CostaLaboratory of Viral Hepatitis, Oswaldo Cruz Institute/ Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Vanessa Cristine de Souza CarneiroLaboratory of Molecular Virology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute/ Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rafael Lopes KaderUniversity Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2350-168X
Marisa Pimentel AmaroUniversity Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lívia Melo VillarLaboratory of Viral Hepatitis, Oswaldo Cruz Institute/ Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fábio MiyajimaOswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Branch Ceará, Eusebio, Brazil.
Soniza Vieira Alves-LeonUniversity Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Vanessa Salete de PaulaLaboratory of Molecular Virology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute/ Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Luciane Almeida Amado LeonLaboratory of Technological Development in Virology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute/ Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Otacilio Cruz MoreiraReal Time PCR Platform RPT09A, Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Endemic Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Institute/ Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5340-8697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an unprecedented need for RT-qPCR-based molecular diagnostic testing, placing a strain on the supply chain and the availability of commercially available PCR testing kits and reagents. The effect of limited molecular diagnostics-related supplies has been felt across the globe, disproportionally impacting molecular diagnostic testing in developing countries where acquisition of supplies is limited due to availability. The increasing global demand for commercial molecular diagnostic testing kits and reagents has made standard PCR assays cost prohibitive, resulting in the development of alternative approaches to detect SARS-CoV-2 in clinical specimens, circumventing the need for commercial diagnostic testing kits while mitigating the high-demand for molecular diagnostics testing. The timely availability of the complete SARS-CoV-2 genome in the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic facilitated the rapid development and deployment of specific primers and standardized laboratory protocols for the molecular diagnosis of COVID-19. An alternative method offering a highly specific manner of detecting and genotyping pathogens within clinical specimens is based on the melting temperature differences of PCR products. This method is based on the melting temperature differences between purine and pyrimidine bases. Here, RT-qPCR assays coupled with a High Resolution Melting analysis (HRM-RTqPCR) were developed to target different regions of the SARS-CoV-2 genome (RdRp, E and N) and an internal control (human RNAse P gene). The assays were validated using synthetic sequences from the viral genome and clinical specimens (nasopharyngeal swabs, serum and saliva) of sixty-five patients with severe or moderate COVID-19 from different states within Brazil; a larger validation group than that used in the development to the commercially available TaqMan RT-qPCR assay which is considered the gold standard for COVID-19 testing. The sensitivity of the HRM-RTqPCR assays targeting the viral N, RdRp and E genes were 94.12, 98.04 and 92.16%, with 100% specificity to the 3 SARS-CoV-2 genome targets, and a diagnostic accuracy of 95.38, 98.46 and 93.85%, respectively. Thus, HRM-RTqPCR emerges as an attractive alternative and low-cost methodology for the molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 in restricted-budget laboratories.

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingFemaleHumansMaleNucleic Acid DenaturationOligonucleotidesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRespiratory MucosaSalivaSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityOligonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID34807915
PMCPMC8608302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.