Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34807577›Full record

ArticleACS nano2021

Nanoconfined Fluids: Uniqueness of Water Compared to Other Liquids.

Fabio Leoni, Carles Calero, Giancarlo Franzese

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Water Networks as Hydrophobic Recognition Motifs in Proteins.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Confinement-induced acceleration of CONature communications · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabio LeoniDepartment of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1595-7804
Carles CaleroSecció de Física Estadística i Interdisciplinària-Departament de Física de la Matèria Condensada, Institut de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia (IN2UB), Universitat de Barcelona, Carrer Martí i Franquès 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1977-1724
Giancarlo FranzeseSecció de Física Estadística i Interdisciplinària-Departament de Física de la Matèria Condensada, Institut de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia (IN2UB), Universitat de Barcelona, Carrer Martí i Franquès 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3006-2766
Institut de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia de la Universitat de BarcelonaSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoconfinement can drastically change the behavior of liquids, puzzling us with counterintuitive properties. It is relevant in applications, including decontamination and crystallization control. However, it still lacks a systematic analysis for fluids with different bulk properties. Here we address this gap. We compare, by molecular dynamics simulations, three different liquids in a graphene slit pore: (1) A simple fluid, such as argon, described by a Lennard-Jones potential; (2) an anomalous fluid, such as a liquid metal, modeled with an isotropic core-softened potential; and (3) water, the prototypical anomalous liquid, with directional HBs. We study how the slit-pore width affects the structure, thermodynamics, and dynamics of the fluids. All the fluids show similar oscillating properties by changing the pore size. However, their free-energy minima are quite different in nature: (i) are energy-driven for the simple liquid; (ii) are entropy-driven for the isotropic core-softened potential; and (iii) have a changing nature for water. Indeed, for water, the monolayer minimum is entropy driven, at variance with the simple liquid, while the bilayer minimum is energy driven, at variance with the other anomalous liquid. Also, water has a large increase in diffusion for subnm slit pores, becoming faster than bulk. Instead, the other two fluids have diffusion oscillations much smaller than water, slowing down for decreasing slit-pore width. Our results, clarifying that water confined at the subnm scale behaves differently from other (simple or anomalous) fluids under similar confinement, are possibly relevant in nanopores applications, for example, in water purification from contaminants.

Indexed as

confinement effectsdiffusionfree energygraphenehydration pressuresimple and anomalous liquidswater hydrogen-bond network

Identifiers

PMID34807577
PMCPMC8717635
OpenAlexW3194096973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.