Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34807437›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Nutritional Regulation of Embryonic Survival, Growth, and Development.

Lawrence P Reynolds, Kyle J McLean, Kacie L McCarthy, Wellison J S Diniz, Ana Clara B Menezes, J Chris Forcherio, Ronald R Scott, Pawel P Borowicz, Alison K Ward, Carl R Dahlen and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
56.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The "ideal protein" concept is not ideal in animal nutrition.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase, Redox Homeostasis and Embryogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Programming of Embryonic Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lawrence P ReynoldsDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA. larry.reynolds@ndsu.edu.
Kyle J McLeanDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA.
Kacie L McCarthyDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA.
Wellison J S DinizDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA.
Ana Clara B MenezesDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA.
J Chris ForcherioPurina Animal Nutrition LLC, Gray Summit, MO, 63039, USA.
Ronald R ScottPurina Animal Nutrition LLC, Gray Summit, MO, 63039, USA.
Pawel P BorowiczDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA.
Alison K WardDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA.
Carl R DahlenDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA.
Joel S CatonDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA.
North Dakota State University · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal nutritional status affects conceptus development and, therefore, embryonic survival, growth, and development. These effects are apparent very early in pregnancy, which is when most embryonic losses occur. Maternal nutritional status has been shown to affect conceptus growth and gene expression throughout the periconceptual period of pregnancy (the period immediately before and after conception). Thus, the periconceptual period may be an important "window" during which the structure and function of the fetus and the placenta are "programmed" by stressors such as maternal malnutrition, which can have long-term consequences for the health and well-being of the offspring, a concept often referred to as Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) or simply developmental programming. In this review, we focus on recent studies, using primarily animal models, to examine the effects of various maternal "stressors," but especially maternal malnutrition and Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART, including in vitro fertilization, cloning, and embryo transfer), during the periconceptual period of pregnancy on conceptus survival, growth, and development. We also examine the underlying mechanisms that have been uncovered in these recent studies, such as effects on the development of both the placenta and fetal organs. We conclude with our view of future research directions in this critical area of investigation.

Indexed as

Maternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPregnancy ComplicationsAnimalsEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleFertilizationFetal DevelopmentFetusHumansPlacentaPregnancyDevelopmentDevelopmental programmingEmbryoEpigeneticsFetusGene expressionGrowthMaternal nutritionMaternal stressorsPlacentaSurvival

Identifiers

PMID34807437
OpenAlexW3217529201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.