ArticleEJNMMI research2021
Value of
Article in EJNMMI research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond pCR Prediction: Subtype-Specific Artificial Intelligence for Treatment Tailoring in Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- Impact of axillary disease extent defined by baselineBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of baseline FDG PET/CT in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with first-line trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Value of early metabolic response for predicting axillary pathological complete response during neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple negative and HER2-amplified breast cancers: impact of tumor subtypes.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- [18 F]-Fluoroestradiol PET (FES-PET) and [18 F] Flurodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET) Imaging May Aid in Managing Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Lobular Breast Cancer.Molecular imaging and biology · 2025Article
- A review of the association between baseline [ 18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and axillary pathological complete response in node-positive breast cancer patients: focus on clinical subtypes.Nuclear medicine communications · 2025Review
- Innovations in Positron Emission Tomography and State of the Art in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer Treatment Response.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is a widely accepted initial treatment modality that can lead to pathologic downstaging of the axillary disease burden in breast cancer patients. Axillary response as well as baseline
methodsPET-parameters derived from the primary tumor as well as the most FDG-avid axillary lymph node were measured on baseline
resultsSixty-six patients with 69 primary tumors were included in this study. Thirty-three axillae contained ER-positive/HER2-negative, 16 HER2-positive, and 20 TN breast cancer. No significant difference in PET-parameters between patients with axillary residual disease and axillary pathologic complete response were found for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. In the combined HER2-positive/TN subgroup, the SUV
conclusionsPredicting axillary response following NST with baseline
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.