ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
The effect of the industrial structure and haze pollution: spatial evidence for China.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the impact of fiscal decentralization on urban pollution intensity in China: A spatial econometric analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- How to Achieve Carbon Neutrality: From the Perspective of Innovative City Pilot Policy in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The Impact of Environmental Regulation, Industrial Structure, and Interaction on the High-Quality Development Efficiency of the Yellow River Basin in China from the Perspective of the Threshold Effect.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction through Technological Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Provinces.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Based on provincial data pertaining to China from 2003 to 2018, this paper empirically analyzes the impact of the industrial structure on haze pollution by constructing static and dynamic spatial econometric models. The marginal contribution of this paper lies in the analysis based on two indicators: the upgrading and rationalization of the industrial structure. The results indicate that: at the overall level, haze pollution in China exhibits a significant positive spatial correlation and remains relatively stable, upgrading and rationalization of the industrial structure can significantly reduce haze pollution, the control variables of technological progress and trade openness yield obvious haze reduction effects, and the market-oriented haze reduction effect is better that of the government behavior. In terms of the robustness, the effect of industrial structure upgrading is not obvious in the eastern regions and even aggravates haze pollution in the central and western regions, while industrial structure rationalization can play a role in haze reduction in all regions. Industrial structure upgrading and rationalization achieve better effects in the southern region but can aggravate haze pollution in the northern region. Based on the results of the time period test, the effect is very obvious at the first stage but not that at the second stage because of the diminishing marginal effect. The robustness results of the replacement of the core variables and dynamic spatial Durbin model further validate the empirical results in this paper. Finally, according to the empirical results, we propose corresponding policy implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34807386What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.