Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34807358›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2022

A behavioural study of obedience in health professional students.

Efrem Violato, Brian Witschen, Emilio Violato, Sharla King

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A multi-institution longitudinal randomised control trial of speaking up: Implications for theory and practice.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. A longitudinal study on the impact of simulation on positive deviance through speaking up.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Efrem ViolatoDepartment of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Alberta, Education North, 11210 - 87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G5, Canada. violato@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2227-2384
Brian WitschenSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Northern Alberta Institute of Technology, Edmonton, Canada.
Emilio ViolatoDepartment of Psychology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sharla KingDepartment of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Alberta, Education North, 11210 - 87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G5, Canada.
University of Alberta · CANorthern Alberta Institute of Technology · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice (IPECP) is a field of study suggested to improve team functioning and patient safety. However, even interprofessional teams are susceptible to group pressures which may inhibit speaking up (positive deviance). Obedience is one group pressure that can inhibit positive deviance leading to negative patient outcomes. To examine the influence of obedience to authority in an interprofessional setting, an experimental simulated clinical scenario was conducted with Respiratory Therapy (RT) (n = 40) and Advanced Care Paramedic (ACP) (n = 20) students. In an airway management scenario, it was necessary for students to challenge an authority, a senior anesthesiologist, to prevent patient harm. In a 2 × 2 design cognitive load and an interventional writing task designed to increase positive deviance were tested. The effect of individual characteristics, including Moral Foundations, and displacement of responsibility were also examined. There was a significant effect for profession and cognitive load: RT students demonstrated lower levels of positive deviance in the low cognitive load scenario than students in other conditions. The writing task did not have a significant effect on RT or ACP students' behaviour. The influence of Moral Foundations differed from expectations, In Group Loyalty was selected as a negative predictor of positive deviance while Respect for Authority was not. Displacement of responsibility was influential for some participants thought not for all. Other individual variables were identified for further investigation. Observational analysis of the simulation videos was conducted to obtain further insight into student behaviour in a compliance scenario. Individual differences, including experience, should be considered when providing education and training for positive deviance. Simulation provides an ideal setting to use compliance scenarios to train for positive deviance and for experimentation to study interprofessional team behaviour.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorStudents, NursingAllied Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansInterprofessional EducationInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamStudentsComplianceDisplacement of responsibilityIndividual differencesMoral foundationObedience to authorityPositive devianceSpeaking up

Identifiers

PMID34807358
PMCPMC9117351
OpenAlexW3216256583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.