Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34807353›Full record

ReviewNeuroinformatics2022

Federated Analysis of Neuroimaging Data: A Review of the Field.

Kelly Rootes-Murdy, Harshvardhan Gazula, Eric Verner, Ross Kelly, Thomas DeRamus, Sergey Plis, Anand Sarwate, Jessica Turner, Vince Calhoun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Current best practices and future opportunities for reproducible findings using large-scale neuroimaging in psychiatry.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  9. Privacy-Preserving Visualization of Brain Functional Connectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. PRIVACY-PRESERVING VISUALIZATION OF BRAIN FUNCTIONAL NETWORK CONNECTIVITY.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Medical Imaging Applications of Federated Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kelly Rootes-Murdy *Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2704-2035
Harshvardhan Gazula *Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Eric VernerGeorgia Institute of Technology, Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ross KellyGeorgia Institute of Technology, Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Thomas DeRamusGeorgia Institute of Technology, Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sergey PlisGeorgia Institute of Technology, Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anand SarwateRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jessica TurnerDepartment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Vince CalhounDepartment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA. vcalhoun@gsu.edu.

Funding

COINSTAC: Decentralized, Scalable Analysis of Loosely Coupled DataR01DA040487 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, PLIS, SERGEY · 2015 to 2024
$7.1M
ENIGMA-COINSTAC-APOE2 Functional and structural connectome protective mechanisms for Alzheimer’s disease and mood disorders: Request for supplemental funds for NIH R01:1R01MH121246R01MH121246 · NIMH · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, TURNER, JESS · 2019 to 2023
$5.0M
A decentralized macro and micro gene-by-environment interaction analysis of substance use behavior and its brain biomarkers R01DA049238 · NIDA · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, LIU, JINGYU · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040487NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA049238NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of neuroimaging has embraced sharing data to collaboratively advance our understanding of the brain. However, data sharing, especially across sites with large amounts of protected health information (PHI), can be cumbersome and time intensive. Recently, there has been a greater push towards collaborative frameworks that enable large-scale federated analysis of neuroimaging data without the data having to leave its original location. However, there still remains a need for a standardized federated approach that not only allows for data sharing adhering to the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reusability) data principles, but also streamlines analyses and communication while maintaining subject privacy. In this paper, we review a non-exhaustive list of neuroimaging analytic tools and frameworks currently in use. We then provide an update on our federated neuroimaging analysis software system, the Collaborative Informatics and Neuroimaging Suite Toolkit for Anonymous Computation (COINSTAC). In the end, we share insights on future research directions for federated analysis of neuroimaging data.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationNeuroimagingSoftwareCOINSTACFederated learningNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID34807353
PMCPMC9124226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.