ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2022
Cytoreductive treatment in real life: a chart review analysis on 1440 patients with polycythemia vera.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- A dynamic prognostic model for polycythemia vera long-term outcomes in patients treated with ruxolitinib.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Value of functional iron parameters in diagnostic re-assessment of MPN: refinement of iron-deficiency markers by zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP).Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia: A Nationwide Population-Based Study on Treatment Patterns, Vascular Complications and Survival.European journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Impact of ELN clinical signs and symptoms on the thrombotic risk in polycythemia vera patients treated with front-line hydroxyurea.Leukemia · 2025Article
- Exploring thromboembolic risk factors in polycythemia vera: from current evidence to PROSPERO study design.Annals of hematology · 2025Review
- Article
- Prevalence, incidence, and thromboembolic events in polycythemia vera: a study based on longitudinal German health claims data.Annals of hematology · 2025Observational
- Novel hydroxamic acid derivative induces apoptosis and constrains autophagy in leukemic cells.Journal of advanced research · 2024Article
- Red Blood Cell Contribution to Thrombosis in Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Interferons in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2024Review
- Diagnosis and treatment of MPN in real life: exploratory and retrospective chart review including 960 MPN patients diagnosed with ET or MF in Germany.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposePatients with polycythemia vera (PV) show an elevated incidence of thromboembolic complications and decreased survival when compared to age-matched healthy individuals. Hypercellularity as indicated by elevated hematocrit, pathophysiological changes induced by the JAK2 driver mutation and cardiovascular risk factors contribute to the increased incidence of thromboembolic events. Higher age and a history of thromboembolic events define a high-risk population of PV patients. Depending on the individual risk profile, phlebotomy or pharmacologic cytoreduction is recommended in combination with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid. Stringent cytoreduction is required for effective risk reduction. However, in recent reports, the rate of thromboembolic complications in PV patients under cytoreductive therapy appears still elevated compared to healthy individuals. This study reports on a chart review to assess for cytoreductive therapy of 1440 PV patients in real life.
methodsForty-two eligible hematologists/oncologists in private practice treating patients with MPN were recruited to participate in a paper-pencil-based survey conducted between January 2019 and March 2020 in Germany. Physicians were asked to report primary documented data obtained from patient charts. Descriptive analyses were conducted to assess for patient characteristics, treatment modalities, risk factors and thromboembolic complications.
resultsData were collected from the patient charts of 1440 individuals diagnosed with PV. The patient population was older than those reported in multicenter trials with a median age of 72.2 years at the time of reporting and 63.5 years at diagnosis. Age was the main factor accounting for high-risk status with 84.7% of patients being above the age of 60 followed by thromboembolic complications reported in 21.3% of patients. The use of pharmacologic cytoreduction was highly variable between participating centers with an average of 60.7% and a range of 10.1-100%. Hydroxyurea was the most frequently used drug followed by ruxolitinib, while interferons were reported for a minority of patients. For 35.4% of patients a persistent need for phlebotomy in addition to cytoreductive treatment was reported. Although presence of high-risk criteria and insufficient disease control were reported as main triggers to initiate pharmacologic cytoreduction, 28.1% had elevated hematocrit values (> 45%) and 38.6% showed persistence of elevated leukocyte count (> 10
conclusionsCytoreductive treatment of high-risk PV in real life is highly variable regarding indication for cytoreduction and definition of therapy resistance. This study highlights the need for (i) improved risk stratification for thromboembolic events, (ii) consequent indication of pharmacologic cytoreduction in high-risk PV and (iii) attention to signs of therapy resistance that can trigger an earlier and stringent switch to second line agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.