ArticleJAMA network open2021
Trends in Use and Expenditures for Brand-name Statins After Introduction of Generic Statins in the US, 2002-2018.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Realizing Benefits of First-in-Class Generic Entry-The Case of SGLT2 Inhibitors.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Pitavastatin in Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Economic implications of the different statin prescribing patterns in Central Portugal: a longitudinal analysis.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- Comparison of treatment patterns, efficacy and safety between generic and branded atorvastatin users in China: a multicenter, retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Expert opinion on the integration of combination therapy into the treatment algorithm for the management of dyslipidaemia: the integration of ezetimibe and bempedoic acid may enhance goal attainment.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025Review
- Microdose Cocktail Study Reveals the Activity and Key Influencing Factors of OATP1B, P-Gp, BCRP, and CYP3A in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Oral and Non-Oral Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs with PCSK9 and Other Biomolecules as Targets: Present Status and Future Prospects.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Statins for preventing preeclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Article
- National-level and state-level prevalence of overweight and obesity among children, adolescents, and adults in the USA, 1990-2021, and forecasts up to 2050.Lancet (London, England) · 2024Article
- Statin Twitter: Human and Automated Bot Contributions, 2010 to 2022.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Article
- HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors for Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023Review
- The Potential Therapeutic Application of Simvastatin for Brain Complications and Mechanisms of Action.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- National Trends in Statin Use in Lithuania from 2010 to 2021.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Translating atherosclerosis research from bench to bedside: navigating the barriers for effective preclinical drug discovery.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The high and increasing expenditures for prescription medications in the US is a national problem. Objective: To explore the association of generic statin competition on relevant use and cost savings and to provide use and expenditure trends for all available statins for private and public payers and for out-of-pocket spending. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study evaluated data from the January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2018, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey by using a difference-in-differences analysis. Participants included noninstitutionalized individual statin users. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2020, to March 30, 2021. Exposures: The market entry of 5 generic statin medications (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin, and pravastatin). Main Outcomes and Measures: National- and individual-level reductions in the annual number of statin purchases and total expenditures across private insurance, public insurance (Medicaid and Medicare), and out-of-pocket spending (presented in 2018 US dollars). Results: Between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2018, an average of 21.35 million statins (95% CI, 16.7-25.5 million) were purchased annually, with an average total annual cost of $24.5 billion (95% CI, $18.2-$28.8 billion). The number of brand-name statin purchases decreased by 90.9% (95% CI, 56%-98%) nationally and 27.4% (95% CI, 13%-40%) individually after the end of market exclusivity. Among major payers, the end of market exclusivity was associated with individual cost savings of $370.00 (95% CI, $430.70-$309.20) for private insurers, $281.00 (95% CI, $346.80-$215.30) for Medicare, $72.34 (95% CI, $95.22-$49.46) for Medicaid, and $211.90 (95% CI, $231.20-$192.50) for out-of-pocket spending. Combining all payers, the decrease translates to $925.60 (95% CI, $1005.00-$846.40) of annual savings per individual and $11.9 billion (95% CI, $10.9-$13.0 billion) for the US. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this survey study suggest that full generic competition of statins was associated with significant cost savings across all major payers within the US health care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.