Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34807258›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Trends in Use and Expenditures for Brand-name Statins After Introduction of Generic Statins in the US, 2002-2018.

Shuo-Yu Lin, Kyle Baumann, Chenxuan Zhou, Weiyu Zhou, Alison Evans Cuellar, Hong Xue

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Statins for preventing preeclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Statin Twitter: Human and Automated Bot Contributions, 2010 to 2022.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors for Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuo-Yu LinDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
Kyle BaumannDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.
Chenxuan ZhouSchool of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Weiyu ZhouDepartment of Statistics, Volgenau School of Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
Alison Evans CuellarDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
Hong XueDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The high and increasing expenditures for prescription medications in the US is a national problem. Objective: To explore the association of generic statin competition on relevant use and cost savings and to provide use and expenditure trends for all available statins for private and public payers and for out-of-pocket spending. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study evaluated data from the January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2018, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey by using a difference-in-differences analysis. Participants included noninstitutionalized individual statin users. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2020, to March 30, 2021. Exposures: The market entry of 5 generic statin medications (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin, and pravastatin). Main Outcomes and Measures: National- and individual-level reductions in the annual number of statin purchases and total expenditures across private insurance, public insurance (Medicaid and Medicare), and out-of-pocket spending (presented in 2018 US dollars). Results: Between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2018, an average of 21.35 million statins (95% CI, 16.7-25.5 million) were purchased annually, with an average total annual cost of $24.5 billion (95% CI, $18.2-$28.8 billion). The number of brand-name statin purchases decreased by 90.9% (95% CI, 56%-98%) nationally and 27.4% (95% CI, 13%-40%) individually after the end of market exclusivity. Among major payers, the end of market exclusivity was associated with individual cost savings of $370.00 (95% CI, $430.70-$309.20) for private insurers, $281.00 (95% CI, $346.80-$215.30) for Medicare, $72.34 (95% CI, $95.22-$49.46) for Medicaid, and $211.90 (95% CI, $231.20-$192.50) for out-of-pocket spending. Combining all payers, the decrease translates to $925.60 (95% CI, $1005.00-$846.40) of annual savings per individual and $11.9 billion (95% CI, $10.9-$13.0 billion) for the US. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this survey study suggest that full generic competition of statins was associated with significant cost savings across all major payers within the US health care system.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDrug CostsDrugs, GenericFemaleForecastingHealth ExpendituresHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedPrescription DrugsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesDrugs, GenericHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID34807258
PMCPMC8609409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.