Physician Responsibility to Discuss Palliative Unproven Therapies With Out-of-Option Patients.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

1. From "Ought" to "Is": Surfacing Values in Patient and Family Advocacy in Rare Diseases.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  From "Ought" to "Is": Surfacing Values in Patient and Family Advocacy in Rare Diseases.2021
• Comment on
  Helpful Lessons and Cautionary Tales: How Should COVID-19 Drug Development and Access Inform Approaches to Non-Pandemic Diseases?2021

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as