Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34806910›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2021

Aspects of Large-Enrollment Online College Science Courses That Exacerbate and Alleviate Student Anxiety.

Tasneem F Mohammed, Erika M Nadile, Carly A Busch, Danielle Brister, Sara E Brownell, Chade T Claiborne, Baylee A Edwards, Joseph Gazing Wolf, Curtis Lunt, Missy Tran and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exam reform: an opportunity for the redistribution of academic power.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Tasneem F MohammedBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Erika M NadileBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Carly A BuschBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Danielle BristerBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Sara E BrownellResearch for Inclusive STEM Education Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Chade T ClaiborneBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Baylee A EdwardsBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Joseph Gazing WolfBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Curtis LuntBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Missy TranBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Cindy VargasBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Kobe M WalkerBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Tamiru D WarkinaBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Madison L WittBiology Education Research Course, School of Life Sciences.
Yi ZhengMary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Katelyn M CooperResearch for Inclusive STEM Education Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute GR35050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety is the top mental health concern for undergraduates. While researchers have identified ways that in-person science courses can affect anxiety, little is known about how online science courses affect anxiety. In this study, 2111 undergraduates at a large research-intensive institution completed survey questions about their anxiety in large-enrollment online science courses. Specifically, we assessed students' anxiety in the context of online science courses and asked what aspects of online science courses increase and decrease their anxiety. Students also identified what instructors can do to lessen anxiety in online classrooms. We used open coding and logistic regression to analyze student responses. More than 50% of students reported at least moderate anxiety in the context of online college science courses. Students commonly reported that the potential for personal technology issues (69.8%) and proctored exams (68.0%) increased their anxiety, while being able to access content at a later time (79.0%) and attending class from where they want (74.2%) decreased their anxiety. The most common ways that students suggested that instructors could decrease student anxiety is to increase test-taking flexibility (25.0%) and be understanding (23.1%). This study provides insight into how instructors can create more inclusive online learning environments for students with anxiety.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceStudentsAnxietyHumansTechnologyUniversities

Identifiers

PMID34806910
PMCPMC8715781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.