Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34806783›Full record

Trial reportHeadache2022

Tolerability and safety of galcanezumab in patients with chronic cluster headache with up to 15 months of galcanezumab treatment.

Miguel J A Láinez, Jean Schoenen, Chad Stroud, Jennifer Bardos, Mark Bangs, Phebe Kemmer, Richard Wenzel, Dulanji K Kuruppu, James Michael Martinez, Tina M Oakes

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Headache, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cluster headache: state of the art in treatment.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Miguel J A LáinezHospital Clinico Universitario, Universidad Católica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Jean SchoenenDepartment of Neurology, Headache Research Unit, Citadelle Hospital, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Chad StroudEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Jennifer BardosEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Mark BangsEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Phebe KemmerEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Richard WenzelEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Dulanji K KuruppuEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
James Michael MartinezEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Tina M OakesEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USCentre hospitalier régional de la Citadelle · BEHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ES

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the study was to assess the tolerability and safety of galcanezumab in patients with chronic cluster headache (CH) with up to 15 months of treatment.

backgroundChronic CH is a highly debilitating disease with a substantial and unmet medical need.

methodsPatients were randomized to receive placebo or galcanezumab (300 mg) monthly for 12 weeks, followed by an optional 52-week open-label extension and 16-week posttreatment follow-up (washout). This is a secondary analysis and long-term follow-up of a previously conducted clinical trial. The safety analysis included patients who received galcanezumab at any time during the study. Outcomes included adverse events (AEs), discontinuations, laboratory values, vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and suicidality ratings.

resultsA total of 233 patients received at least one galcanezumab dose. The mean exposure was 341 days. Galcanezumab-treated patients were mostly male (n = 169/233; 72.5%) with a mean age of 44.9 (±10.9) years. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 185 patients (n = 185/233; 79.4%), 23 patients (n = 23/233; 9.9%) reported serious adverse events (SAEs), and 18 patients (n = 18/233; 7.7%) discontinued due to AEs. The SAE CH was reported by three patients. The most common TEAEs (>10%) were nasopharyngitis (n = 41/233; 17.6%) and injection site pain (n = 33/233; 14.2%). 27.5% of patients (n = 64/233) had TEAEs related to injection sites. Likely hypersensitivity events, including injection site rash, injection site urticaria, and injection site hypersensitivity were reported (n = 14/233; 6.0%). There were past histories of suicidal ideation (n = 55/237; 23.2%) and suicidal behavior (n = 9/236; 3.8%). During the study, 15 patients (n = 15/230; 6.5%), seven with previous history, reported suicidal ideation. One patient had a nonfatal suicide attempt during the open-label extension and an aborted attempt during the washout. There were no new safety findings compared with the placebo-controlled treatment period in laboratory values, vital signs, or ECGs.

conclusionsGalcanezumab 300 mg monthly had a favorable tolerability and safety profile in patients with chronic CH with up to 15 months of treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChronic DiseaseCluster HeadacheDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedgalcanezumabadverse eventscalcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodylong-term exposure

Identifiers

PMID34806783
PMCPMC9299588
OpenAlexW3215239576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.