Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34806598›Full record

ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2022

Predictive value of preoperative inflammatory markers and serum CA 125 level for surgical outcome in Indonesian women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Winata I Gde Sastra, Prayudi Pande Kadek Aditya, Ongko Eric Gradiyanto, Suwiyoga Ketut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Winata I Gde SastraDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Udayana University/Sanglah Hospital, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.
Prayudi Pande Kadek AdityaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Udayana University/Sanglah Hospital, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.
Ongko Eric GradiyantoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Udayana University/Sanglah Hospital, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.
Suwiyoga KetutDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Udayana University/Sanglah Hospital, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is essential in the management of ovarian cancers to identify the patients who will benefit from primary complete cytoreductive surgery and those who will rather benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

objectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of preoperative inflammatory markers, i.e. platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), red cell distribution width (RDW), and serum CA125 level for surgical outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer.

methodsA retrospective study was carried out in Sanglah Hospital, Denpasar, Bali. A total of 54 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent primary exploratory laparotomy from January 2018 to November 2019 was recruited. Data about clinical characteristics, preoperative inflammatory markers, serum CA125 level, and surgical outcome (optimal vs. suboptimal) was collected from the medical records. Predictive value of the markers were evaluated using ROC curve to determine their accuracy (area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value).

resultsMean age, parity, and tumor size did not differ between the study groups (p> 0.05). The group with suboptimal outcome had significantly higher PLR, NLR, MLR, and RDW value (p< 0.05). Using the ROC curve, a cut off value was determined for each predictor, i.e. PLR: 196.50, NLR: 3.34, MLR: 0.24, RDW: 13.19, CA125: 300.85. AUC for each predictor were as follows: PLR 0.718 (95% CI: 0.578-0.859), NLR 0.676 (95% CI: 0.529-0.823), MLR 0.700 (95% CI: 0.560-0.839), RDW 0.712 (95% CI: 0.572-0.852), CA125 0.593 (95% CI: 0.436-0.750). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for predicting suboptimal outcome were as follows: PLR (74.2%, 69.6%, 72.2%), NLR (64.5%, 60.9%, 62.9%), MLR (74.2%, 59.1%, 66.7%), RDW (74.2%, 60.9%, 68.5%), CA125 (54.8%, 60.9%, 57.4%). We have some limitations such as small numbers of sample, we generalized whole kinds of ovarian cancer, and this study does not describe follow-up features.

conclusionPreoperative serum inflammatory markers (PLR, MLR, and RDW) may serve as useful markers to predict the surgical outcome with fair accuracy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

LymphocytesOvarian NeoplasmsBiomarkersBlood PlateletsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansIndonesiaNeutrophilsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersEpithelial ovarian cancerinflammatory markerspredictive valuesurgical outcome

Identifiers

PMID34806598
PMCPMC12364174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.