Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34806562›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2021

Latileta Odrovakavula, Masoud Mohammadnezhad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Latileta OdrovakavulaPublic Health, School of Public Health and Primary Care, Fiji National University, Suva Fiji Islands.
Masoud MohammadnezhadPublic Health (Health Promotion), School of Public Health and Primary Care, Fiji National University, Suva Fiji Islands.ORCID 0000-0002-5048-9719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdolescent wellness over the years has been a major public health concern. The adolescent period is stated to be a critical phase as developments occur in all areas of the individual. This study aims to explore secondary school students' perceptions on knowledge of wellness, influences of wellness, prioritization of wellness dimensions and ideal adolescent wellness programmes in Fiji.

methodThis study qualitatively investigates adolescents in four purposively selected schools in Suva, Fiji. 31 students who enrolled into years 11 to 13 in the selected schools were interviewed in-depthly using a semi-structured, open-ended questionnaire. Data was transcribed and classified into categories, sub-themes and major themes.

resultsParticipants' responses indicated wellness perceived as multidimensional with no regard to dimensional balance. Family, peers and school support, social media, nutrition and physical activities are factors perceived to influence wellness. The availability of school counsellors, facilitation of effective school health programmes, and incorporation of wellness into the school curriculum were perceived as ideal ways to increase adolescent wellness.

conclusionsThis study provides important research findings of adolescent wellness for Fiji's health sector, its policymakers and programme developers. Further studies are needed to understand the broad concept of wellness and its several dimensions.

Indexed as

SchoolsStudentsAdolescentCurriculumExerciseFijiHumansAdolescents wellnessFijiideal wellness programmewellness dimension

Identifiers

PMID34806562
PMCPMC8843379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.