ArticleThe Analyst2021
Method for analysis of environmental lead contamination in soils.
Article in The Analyst, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Integration of Glutathione-Functionalized Optical Fiber SPR Sensor for Ultra-Sensitive Detection of Lead Ions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Design, synthesis, and density functional theory studies of a new selective chemosensor for PbHeliyon · 2023Article
- Detection Efficiency of Ag Nanoparticle Labels for a Heart Failure Marker Using Linear and Square-Wave Anodic Stripping Voltammetry.Biosensors · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A method for lead (Pb) detection in soil is presented. Pb is a dangerous environmental pollutant that is present in soils, posing a health risk to millions of people worldwide, and regular monitoring of Pb contamination in soils is essential to public health. Many sensitive methods for detection of heavy metals in solid matrices exist, but they cannot be performed on-site because they are costly (>$30 per sample), require trained personnel, and many classical sample preparation methods are not safe to bring into the field. We describe an alternative process, combining a safer sample preparation method with electrochemical analysis. The process requires minimal training, making it an attractive overall method for regular environmental screening of Pb in soils. Extract obtained from the soil is pH adjusted and analyzed using a stencil-printed carbon electrode and square wave anodic stripping voltammetry. In this work, a study of 15 neighborhood soils examining the concentration of Pb present post-extraction was performed to demonstrate the method. The limit of detection for the electrochemical analysis was calculated to be 16 ppb-well below the United States Environmental Protection Agency's action limit for Pb in soils (400 mg kg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.