Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34806021›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2021

Efficacy and Safety of Vilobelimab (IFX-1), a Novel Monoclonal Anti-C5a Antibody, in Patients With Early Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock-A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase IIa Trial (SCIENS Study).

Michael Bauer, Andreas Weyland, Gernot Marx, Frank Bloos, Stephan Weber, Norbert Weiler, Stefan Kluge, Anja Diers, Tim Philipp Simon, Ingmar Lautenschläger and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Pharmacological immunomodulation in sepsis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Complement Inhibition in Kidney Transplantation: Where Are We Now?BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Michael BauerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Andreas WeylandResearch Center Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Gernot MarxDepartment of Intensive and Intermediate Care Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Frank BloosDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Stephan WeberACOMED statistik, Leipzig, Germany.
Norbert WeilerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Stefan KlugeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Anja DiersDepartment of Anesthesiology/Intensive Care Medicine/Emergency Medicine/Pain Therapy, University Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Tim Philipp SimonDepartment of Intensive and Intermediate Care Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Ingmar LautenschlägerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Matthias GründlingDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Ulrich JaschinskiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Philipp SimonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Leipzig Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany.
Axel NierhausDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Onnen MoererDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Lorenz ReillDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Angiology, Nephrology, and Conservative Intensive Care Medicine, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Achim JörresDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Renfeng GuoInflaRx GmbH, Jena, Germany.
Markus LoefflerInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Konrad ReinhartDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Niels RiedemannInflaRx GmbH, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DEInflarx (Germany) · DEStatistisches Bundesamt · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DELeipzig University · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaphylatoxin C5a, a proinflammatory complement split product, plays a central role in mediating organ dysfunction.

objectivesThis phase II clinical trial was conducted to study safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of vilobelimab, a recombinant monoclonal antibody against C5a, in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

designMulticenter, randomized, and placebo-controlled study. SETTING AND

participantsEleven multidisciplinary ICUs across Germany. Adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and with early onset of infection-associated organ dysfunction. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients were randomly assigned in a ratio of 2:1 to three subsequent dosing cohorts for IV vilobelimab or placebo receiving either 2 × 2 mg/kg (0 and 12 hr), 2 × 4 mg/kg (0 and 24 hr), and 3 × 4 mg/kg (0, 24, and 72 hr). Co-primary endpoints were pharmacodynamics (assessed by C5a concentrations), pharmacokinetics (assessed by vilobelimab concentrations), and safety of vilobelimab. Preliminary efficacy was evaluated by secondary objectives.

resultsSeventy-two patients were randomized (16 patients for each vilobelimab dosing cohort and eight patients for each placebo dosing cohort). Vilobelimab application was associated with dosing dependent decrease in C5a compared with baseline ( CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Administration of vilobelimab in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock selectively neutralizes C5a in a dose-dependent manner without blocking formation of the membrane attack complex and without resulting in detected safety issues. The data warrant further investigation of C5a inhibition in sepsis.

Indexed as

adultantibodiescomplement C5ahumansmonoclonalsepsis/*drug therapy/immunologytreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID34806021
PMCPMC8601347
OpenAlexW3217003235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.