ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2021
mmCSM-NA: accurately predicting effects of single and multiple mutations on protein-nucleic acid binding affinity.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- DeepPNI: a language- and graph-based model for mutation-driven protein-nucleic acid binding energetics.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- A three generation family with VACTERL association is found to have a rare form of diamond-blackfan anaemia.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Decoding the effects of mutation on protein interactions using machine learning.Biophysics reviews · 2025Review
- Article
- PRIMITI: A computational approach for accurate prediction of miRNA-target mRNA interaction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Article
- PNBACE: an ensemble algorithm to predict the effects of mutations on protein-nucleic acid binding affinity.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Engineering G protein-coupled receptors for stabilization.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- Prediction of hot spots in protein-DNA binding interfaces based on discrete wavelet transform and wavelet packet transform.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Determinants of DNMT2/TRDMT1 preference for substrates tRNA and DNA during the evolution.RNA biology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
While protein-nucleic acid interactions are pivotal for many crucial biological processes, limited experimental data has made the development of computational approaches to characterise these interactions a challenge. Consequently, most approaches to understand the effects of missense mutations on protein-nucleic acid affinity have focused on single-point mutations and have presented a limited performance on independent data sets. To overcome this, we have curated the largest dataset of experimentally measured effects of mutations on nucleic acid binding affinity to date, encompassing 856 single-point mutations and 141 multiple-point mutations across 155 experimentally solved complexes. This was used in combination with an optimized version of our graph-based signatures to develop mmCSM-NA (http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/mmcsm_na), the first scalable method capable of quantitatively and accurately predicting the effects of multiple-point mutations on nucleic acid binding affinities. mmCSM-NA obtained a Pearson's correlation of up to 0.67 (RMSE of 1.06 Kcal/mol) on single-point mutations under cross-validation, and up to 0.65 on independent non-redundant datasets of multiple-point mutations (RMSE of 1.12 kcal/mol), outperforming similar tools. mmCSM-NA is freely available as an easy-to-use web-server and API. We believe it will be an invaluable tool to shed light on the role of mutations affecting protein-nucleic acid interactions in diseases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.