Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34805952›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional medicine2021

The value of PIVKA-Ⅱ versus AFP for the diagnosis and detection of postoperative changes in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Qiuyan Lee, Xixiang Yu, Weiwei Yu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiuyan LeeWenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xixiang YuInterventional Vascular surgery, Wenzhou people's Hospital, China.
Weiwei YuWenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wenzhou Medical University · CNWenzhou City People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the diagnostic value of abnormal prothrombin Ⅱ (PIVKA-Ⅱ) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

methodsFrom 2018 0.01 to 2020.01, there were 158 patients with primary liver cancer caused by chronic hepatitis B (male 116, women 42) and 62 patients with chronic hepatitis B (male 34, female 28). The levels of serum PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP were measured, and the results were statistically analyzed.

resultsThe value of PIVKA-Ⅱin liver cancer group was distinctly higher than that in chronic viral hepatitis B group, the difference is statistically significant (P ​< ​0.05). So does the value of AFP. Draw the subject working characteristic curve (ROC curve), the area under the curve of AFP and PIVKA-Ⅱ is 0.799 and 0.836, and that of the combination of AFP and PIVKA-Ⅱ is 0.854, the sensitivity is 57.6%,68.4%,72.2%,respectively, the specificity is 93.5%, 98.4%, 96.8%, respectively. After operation or interventional therapy, the value of PIVKA-Ⅱ in liver cancer group was clearly lower than that before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant.

conclusionIn the diagnostic value of primary liver cancer, PIVKA-II combined with AFP is higher than PIVKA-II, while AFP has the lowest benefit. We also find that PIVKA-II has higher disease monitoring value than AFP.

Indexed as

AFP ROC curve Primary hepatocellular carcinomaPIVKA-Ⅱ

Identifiers

PMID34805952
PMCPMC8562275
OpenAlexW3136203628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.