ArticleJournal of interventional medicine2020
Efficacy of pipeline endovascular device and Willis stent graft in the treatment of traumatic pseudo intracranial aneurysms.
Article in Journal of interventional medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Use of a new low-profile coronary stent graft for the treatment of intracranial carotid blow-out.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Willis covered stent treatment for internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm: A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety.Heliyon · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the advantages and effects of pipeline embolization device (PED) or Willis stent, in treating traumatic pseudoaneurysms. Traumatic pseudo intracranial aneurysms (TPIA) can be caused by either direct trauma or iatrogenic injuries, usually caused by direct arterial wall injury or shear due to acceleration. We describe a series of patients with TPIA who received a PED or Willis stent. MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective analysis was performed on nine patients with TPIA admitted to the southern hospital of Southern Medical University from December 2017 to June 2019, of whom four were treated with PED and five were implanted with six Willis covered stents. The occlusive rate and complication in the two kinds of stents were compared by postoperative follow-up and modified rankin score (MRS).
resultsAfter the implantation of PED, four patients showed an immediate stagnation of blood flow or a decreased filling in aneurysms, three out of four patients exhibited complete occlusion, and the remaining patient had nearly complete occlusion. Four out of five cases of Willis stent implantation were associated with immediate complete occlusion of aneurysms, and the modified rankin score of these patients ranged from 0 to 1. One patient died of unassociated complications.
conclusionFor different types of TPIA in the internal carotid artery (ICA), PED and Willis stents provide significant advantages in treatment, with fewer postoperative complications and prognosis well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.