ArticleJournal of interventional medicine2019
Preoperative evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with assistance of 3D printing technique: Reanalysis of 4 death cases.
Article in Journal of interventional medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The application of 3D printing in preoperative planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review.Biomedical engineering online · 2022Pooled it
- The Application of Precision Medicine in Structural Heart Diseases: A Step towards the Future.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Feasibility of 3-dimensional printed models in simulated training and teaching of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can have some fatal complications during and after the operation. Until recently, pre-procedural imaging with cardiac computed tomography (CT), which is required to evaluate for TAVR, had its own imperfections. We aimed to determine whether 3D printed models can predict complications when other pre-procedural imaging techniques failed.
methodsVascular center patients with aortic valve stenosis, who died after TAVR between June 2011 and June 2016, were enrolled in this retrospective study. The CT datasets of the patients were imported into a three-dimensional (3D) construction software and then printed by flexible material. To predict complications during and after operations, we designed a release test using the non-valved stent mode that was consistent with the Edwards Sapien XT valve in size and radial support force.
resultThe 3D model predicted the coronary obstruction and annular rupture in the in vitro release process, which was consistent with what happened in the actual operation.
conclusionThree-dimensional modeling facilitates pre-operative assessment of patients receiving TAVR, with accurate simulation of intraoperative status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.