Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34805890›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional medicine2019

Shanghai expert consensus on totally implantable access ports 2019.

Xiaoyi Ding, Fang Ding, Yonggang Wang, Liying Wang, Jianfeng Wang, Lichao Xu, Wentao Li, Jijin Yang, Xiaoxi Meng, Min Yuan and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Management of Venous Access Port to Overcome Kinesiophobia of Patients with Malignant Tumors: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Surgical complications of totally implantable venous access port in children with malignant tumors].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Venous access devices (Review).Medicine international
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xiaoyi DingRuijin Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Fang DingSixth People's Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Yonggang WangSixth People's Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Liying WangFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jianfeng WangShanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Lichao XuFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Wentao LiFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jijin YangChanghai Hospital Affiliated with The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Xiaoxi MengChangzheng Hospital Affiliated with The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
Min YuanShanghai Public Health Clinical Center Affiliated with Fudan University, Shanghai, 200083, China.
Jun ChuShanghai Children's Medical Center Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Feng GeZhongshan Hospital Affiliated with Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Weihua DongChangzheng Hospital Affiliated with The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
Mei XueFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Shanghai Cooperation Group on Central Venous Access Vascular Access Committee of the Solid Tumor Theranostics Committee, Shanghai Anti-Cancer Association

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Totally implantable access ports (TIAPs) are used for patients with poor peripheral vascular support requiring central venous access. In recent years, TIAPs have been gradually accepted and promoted by patients, doctors, and nurses owing to their advantages of convenient carrying, a long maintenance period, low complications, and a high quality of life for patients. Currently, medical personnel that handle TIAP implantation and management in China are from different areas of healthcare, including surgery, internal medicine, radiology, nurse anesthesia, vascular access, etc., and many only handle TIAP as a part of their duties. Therefore, the operating procedures and steps for the diagnosis and treatment of complications of TIAP vary from person to person, resulting in different incidence and treatment methods for complications in the implantation and use of TIAP in different medical units. Based on this, we have updated the Shanghai expert consensus on TIAPs from 2015 and explored the diagnosis and treatment procedures of related complications while continuing to emphasize standardized implantation and maintenance.

Indexed as

ComplicationImplantationMaintenanceStandardTotally implantable access port

Identifiers

PMID34805890
PMCPMC8562251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.