ArticleJournal of interventional medicine2019
Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin versus sorafenib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Journal of interventional medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic therapy plus HAIC versus systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Adverse events associated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its combination therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of multimodality treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: patient-level network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with sorafenib versus sorafenib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus programmed death-1 inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Anticancer Effect of Polyphyllin I in Suppressing Stem Cell-Like Properties of Hepatocellular Carcinoma via the AKT/GSK-3Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Article
- Revisiting Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the efficacy of sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with oxaliplatin to that of sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
methodsThis was a retrospective, single-center trial. Between April 3, 2017 and July 2, 2018, 104 patients with Child-Pugh A and advanced HCC received either 400 mg of sorafenib orally twice daily plus HAIC with oxaliplatin (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m
resultsThe median overall survival was 9.37 months (95% CI, 7.05-11.68) in the soraOXA group versus 4.8 months (95% CI, 2.98-6.62) in the sorafenib group (HR 0.46 [95% CI, 0.29-0.72];
conclusionCompared with sorafenib alone, sorafenib plus HAIC with oxaliplatin showed favorable treatment outcomes in patients with advanced HCC. The merits of this approach need to be established with a prospective trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.