Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34805800›Full record

ArticleiScience2021

Ancient genome analyses shed light on kinship organization and mating practice of Late Neolithic society in China.

Chao Ning, Fan Zhang, Yanpeng Cao, Ling Qin, Mark J Hudson, Shizhu Gao, Pengcheng Ma, Wei Li, Shuzheng Zhu, Chunxia Li and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Descent, marriage, and residence practices of a 3,800-year-old pastoral community in Central Eurasia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. DNA insights into Neolithic society.Nature human behaviour · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chao NingResearch Center for Chinese Frontier Archaeology of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Fan ZhangSchool of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, China.
Yanpeng CaoHenan Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology, Zhengzhou 450000, China.
Ling QinSchool of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Mark J HudsonMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Shizhu GaoCollege of Pharmacia Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
Pengcheng MaSchool of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, China.
Wei LiSchool of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Shuzheng ZhuHenan Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology, Zhengzhou 450000, China.
Chunxia LiSchool of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Tianjiao LiSchool of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, China.
Yang XuSchool of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, China.
Chunxiang LiSchool of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, China.
Martine RobbeetsMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Hai ZhangSchool of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Yinqiu CuiResearch Center for Chinese Frontier Archaeology of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Jilin University · CNMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History · DEPeking University · CNHenan Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropology began in the late nineteenth century with an emphasis on kinship as a key factor in human evolution. From the 1960s, archaeologists attempted increasingly sophisticated ways of reconstructing prehistoric kinship but ancient DNA analysis has transformed the field, making it possible, to directly examine kin relations from human skeletal remains. Here, we retrieved genomic data from four Late Neolithic individuals in central China associated with the Late Neolithic Longshan culture. We provide direct evidence of consanguineous mating in ancient China, revealing inbreeding among the Longshan populations. By combining ancient genomic data with anthropological and archaeological evidence, we further show that Longshan society household was built based on the extended beyond the nuclear family, coinciding with intensified social complexity during the Longshan period, perhaps showing the transformation of large communities through a new role of genetic kinship-based extended family units.

Indexed as

Biological sciencesEvolutionary biologyGeneticsPaleobiologyPaleogenetics

Identifiers

PMID34805800
PMCPMC8590084
OpenAlexW3210357042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.