Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34805778›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP2021

Characterizing the reach of comprehensive medication management in a population health primary care model.

Deborah L Pestka, Amanda R Brummel, Michelle T Wong, Abhijeet Rajpurohit, Brent A Elert, Joel F Farley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Barriers and facilitators to implementing pharmacist-provided comprehensive medication management in primary care transformation.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah L PestkaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care & Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Amanda R BrummelFairview Pharmacy Services, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Michelle T WongFairview Pharmacy Services, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abhijeet RajpurohitDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care & Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Brent A ElertM Health Fairview, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Joel F FarleyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care & Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Fairview Health Services · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002492 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI INGBAR, DAVID H · 2018 to 2022
$6.3M
Minnesota Learning Health System Mentored Career Development Program (MN-LHS)K12HS026379 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BEEBE, TIMOTHY, LINZER, MARK · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026379NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs care teams adopt team-based models of care, it is important to examine the reach of interdisciplinary services, such as pharmacists providing comprehensive medication management (CMM). This study examined the reach of pharmacist-delivered CMM in the first 10 months of a population health-focused primary care transformation (PCT).

methodsUsing electronic health record data, descriptive statistics (counts and percentages, as well as means and standard deviations) were quantified to summarize the patients who received CMM in two PCT pilot clinics pre- and post-PCT.

resultsPatients who had at least one CMM visit increased from 554 during the pre-PCT window to 880 during the post-PCT window. However, when adjusted for the increased pharmacist full-time equivalents (FTE) included as part of the PCT, 462 and 330 patients/FTE were seen in the pre- vs post-PCT periods, respectively. When calculating the percentage of patients who received CMM, this increased from 2.3% of all primary care patients seen in the two pilot clinics before the PCT began to 4.4% after the PCT was implemented. Most patient demographics remained largely the same between the pre- and post-PCT periods. However, CMM patients seen in the post-PCT period had more medication therapy problems across all medication therapy problem categories compared to patients in the pre-PCT period. Additionally, patients receiving CMM had significantly more conditions and medications and higher hospitalizations and emergency department use compared to the general clinic population.

conclusionsReach is an important implementation outcome to determine the representativeness of individuals participating in a given service. This study illustrates that pharmacists providing CMM see complex patients with a high propensity for medication therapy problems. However, opportunities exist to improve the reach of CMM and, in turn, enhance team-based care.

Indexed as

implementation sciencemedication therapy managementprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34805778
PMCPMC8596459
OpenAlexW3199295994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.