ArticleKidney international reports2021
Catheter Port Reversal in Citrate Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Different distances between central venous catheter tips can affect antibiotic clearance during continuous renal replacement therapy.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024Article
- In an endotoxaemic model, antibiotic clearance can be affected by different central venous catheter positions, during renal replacement therapy.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKnowledge of effects of catheter port reversal (CathPR), when blood is withdrawn from the venous port and returned via the arterial port, often used in dysfunctional catheters in renal replacement therapy, is limited in the setting of citrate continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH).
methodsIn this open trial, post-filter ionized calcium (PfiCa), post-filter citrate concentration (PfCC), catheter recirculation, and solute clearance were measured before, during, and after 6 hours of CathPR, in well-functioning catheters. All other settings, including citrate settings, were left constant during the study.
resultsTwenty-three patients were included. Mean PfiCa before CathPR of 0.36 mmol/L (SD 0.06) decreased to 0.31 (0.04) after 2 hours (
conclusionCathPR caused a significant decrease in PfiCA and increase in PfCC. Calcium handling differs from other solutes because of increases caused in citrate concentration and subsequent effects on calcium chelation. In citrate CVVH, CathPR in dysfunctional catheters should be limited in time, with intensive follow-up. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT024600416. Registered 9 November 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.