ArticleTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2021
Clinical and laboratory parameters associated with li-rads as diagnostic of liver nodule in patients with cirrhosis.
Article in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and validation of NSMC-ASIL, a predictive model for risk assessment of malignant hepatic nodules.American journal of cancer research · 2022Article
- Preoperative differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma with peripheral rim-like enhancement from intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma on contrast-enhanced MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer in the world. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of a cirrhotic patient with a liver nodule may show alterations suggesting malignancy. There is a lack of questions related to diagnosis of HCC and evaluation of liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) could be a tool for early diagnosis of HCC. This aims to confirm an association between clinical and laboratory characteristics in cirrhotic patients with hepatic nodule after LI-RADS categorization.
methodsA cross-sectional retrospective study was performed with 62 patients grouped according to LI-RADS algorithm. Differences between groups were confirmed using association tests and the Kappa test was employed to provide further confirmation.
resultsAssociations were observed after univariate analysis with higher values of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P=0.008), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (P=0.019), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (P=0.0052), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) (P=0.0023), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (P=0.0001), nodule size (P=0.0001) and age (P=0.007) in LR 5 group compared to LR 3. Univariate analysis also revealed higher levels for the LR5 group of ALP (P=0.0228), AFP (P=0.022) and age (P=0.046) in relation to LR 1+2 group. AFP also had higher serum levels in the LR 4 group compared to LR 1+2 (P=0.004). After multivariate analysis, higher levels in LR5 group of nodule size (P=0.047) and ALP (P=0.027) were observed in relation to LR3, and were therefore considered predictors of HCC diagnosis.
conclusionsThe study suggests that the combination of clinical-laboratory and radiological factors, such as heightened serum levels of ALP and hepatic nodule size, may support the screening of HCC in cirrhotic patients with hepatic nodules using the LI-RADS algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.