Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34805529›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Potential Impact of Pass/Fail Scores on USMLE Step 1: Predictors of Excellence in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training.

Sejal Tamakuwala, Joshua Dean, Katherine J Kramer, Adib Shafi, Sarah Ottum, Joshua George, Satinder Kaur, Conrad R Chao, Maurice-Andre Recanati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Effect of Pass/Fail Exam Grading on Exam Performance in a Pediatric Clerkship.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
  5. Impact of a USMLE Step 2 Prediction Model on Medical Student Motivations.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sejal TamakuwalaEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joshua DeanBeaumont, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Katherine J KramerSt. Vincent's Catholic Medical Centers, New York, NY, USA.
Adib ShafiWayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sarah OttumDetroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8729-1095
Joshua GeorgeDetroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6188-6755
Satinder KaurWayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Conrad R ChaoUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-8703
Maurice-Andre RecanatiWayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0974-3962
Wayne State University · USDetroit Medical Center · USBeaumont Health · USCatholic Medical Center · USEmory University · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe study aims to determine resident applicant metrics most predictive of academic and clinical performance as measured by the Council of Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) examination scores and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) clinical performance (Milestones) in the aftermath of United States Medical Licensing Examination Scores (USMLE) Step 1 becoming a pass/fail examination.

methodsIn this retrospective study, electronic and paper documents for Wayne State University Obstetrics and Gynecology residents matriculated over a 5-year period ending July 2018 were collected. USMLE scores, clerkship grade, and wording on the letters of recommendation as well as Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) were extracted from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) and scored numerically. Semiannual Milestone evaluations and yearly CREOG scores were used as a marker of resident performance. Statistical analysis on residents (n = 75) was performed using R and SPSS and significance was set at

resultsMean USMLE score correlated with CREOG performance and, of all 3 Steps, Step 1 had the tightest association. MSPE and class percentile also correlated with CREOGs. Clerkship grade and recommendation letters had no correlation with resident performance. Of all metrics provided by ERAS, none taken alone, were as useful as Step 1 scores at predicting performance in residency. Regression modeling demonstrated that the combination of Step 2 scores with MSPE wording restored the predictive ability lost by Step 1.

conclusionsThe change of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail may alter resident selection strategies. Other objective markers are needed in order to evaluate an applicant's future performance in residency.

Indexed as

CREOGin-service examinationresident selectionStep 1USMLE

Identifiers

PMID34805529
PMCPMC8597065
OpenAlexW3211602110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.