Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34805450›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of stress2021

Stronger functional network connectivity and social support buffer against negative affect during the COVID-19 outbreak and after the pandemic peak.

Mingyue Xiao, Ximei Chen, Haijing Yi, Yijun Luo, Qiaoling Yan, Tingyong Feng, Qinghua He, Xu Lei, Jiang Qiu, Hong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of stress, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mingyue XiaoKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.
Ximei ChenKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.
Haijing YiKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.
Yijun LuoKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.
Qiaoling YanKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.
Tingyong FengKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.
Qinghua HeKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.
Xu LeiKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.
Jiang QiuKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.
Hong ChenKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health and financial uncertainties, as well as enforced social distancing, during the COVID-19 pandemic have adversely affected the mental health of people. These impacts are expected to continue even after the pandemic, particularly for those who lack support from family and friends. The salience network (SN), default mode network (DMN), and frontoparietal network (FPN) function in an interconnected manner to support information processing and emotional regulation processes in stressful contexts. In this study, we examined whether functional connectivity of the SN, DMN, and FPN, measured using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging before the pandemic, is a neurobiological marker of negative affect (NA) during the COVID-19 pandemic and after its peak in a large sample (N = 496, 360 females); the moderating role of social support in the brain-NA association was also investigated. We found that participants reported an increase in NA during the pandemic compared to before the pandemic, and the NA did not decrease, even after the peak period. People with higher connectivity within the SN and between the SN and the other two networks reported less NA during and after the COVID-19 outbreak peak, and the buffer effect was stronger if their social support was greater. These findings suggest that the functional networks that are responsible for affective processing and executive functioning, as well as the social support from family and friends, play an important role in protecting against NA under stressful and uncontrollable situations.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicDefault mode networkFrontoparietal networkNegative affectSalience networkSocial support

Identifiers

PMID34805450
PMCPMC8592855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.