Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34805320›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in AF Patients With Cancer: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies.

Fuwei Liu, Zixuan Xu, Jun Luo, Peng Yu, Jianyong Ma, Ping Yuan, Wengen Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: First Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Revisiting important issues in cancer and atrial fibrillation.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Fuwei LiuDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital of Nanchang University, Ganzhou, China.
Zixuan XuDepartment of Emergency, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jun LuoDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital of Nanchang University, Ganzhou, China.
Peng YuDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jianyong MaDepartment of Pharmacology and Systems Physiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Ping YuanDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Wengen ZhuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ganzhou People's Hospital · CNNanchang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcancerdirect oral anticoagulantsmeta-analysisvitamin K antagonists

Identifiers

PMID34805320
PMCPMC8602680
OpenAlexW3212195267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.