ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2021
Remote Optogenetics Using Up/Down-Conversion Phosphors.
Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Closed-Loop-Capable Neural Interface Platform for Deep Brain Modulation via Integrated Non-Viral Gene Delivery, NIR Optogenetics, and Electrophysiological Recording.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Implantable Light-Powered Human Designer Cells for Electrical Energy Generation.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Comparative Validation of Scintillator Materials for X-Ray-Mediated Neuronal Control in the Deep Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Unlocking nature's brilliance: using Antarctic extremophile Shewanella baltica to biosynthesize lanthanide-containing nanoparticles with optical up-conversion.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Tetherless Optical Neuromodulation: Wavelength from Orange-red to Mid-infrared.Neuroscience bulletin · 2024Review
- Probing the optical properties and toxicological profile of zinc tungstate nanorods.The Journal of chemical physics · 2024Article
- Parvalbumin Role in Epilepsy and Psychiatric Comorbidities: From Mechanism to Intervention.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial rhodopsins widely used for optogenetics are sensitive to light in the visible spectrum. As visible light is heavily scattered and absorbed by tissue, stimulating light for optogenetic control does not reach deep in the tissue irradiated from outside the subject body. Conventional optogenetics employs fiber optics inserted close to the target, which is highly invasive and poses various problems for researchers. Recent advances in material science integrated with neuroscience have enabled remote optogenetic control of neuronal activities in living animals using up- or down-conversion phosphors. The development of these methodologies has stimulated researchers to test novel strategies for less invasive, wireless control of cellular functions in the brain and other tissues. Here, we review recent reports related to these new technologies and discuss the current limitations and future perspectives toward the establishment of non-invasive optogenetics for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.