Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34805107›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

Current Status of Breast Organoid Models.

Srivarshini Cherukupalli Mohan, Tian-Yu Lee, Armando E Giuliano, Xiaojiang Cui

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Live-cell imaging of mammary organoids using light sheet microscopy.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Breast Morphogenesis: From Normal Development to Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  8. A novel preclinical model of the normal human breast.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Article
  9. Using Organoids to Tap Mammary Gland Diversity for Novel Insight.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Srivarshini Cherukupalli MohanDepartment of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Tian-Yu LeeDepartment of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Armando E GiulianoDepartment of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Xiaojiang CuiDepartment of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

The Role of FOXCI in Basal-like Breast CancerR01CA151610 · NCI · SAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE · PI CUI, XIAOJIANG · 2011 to 2022
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among women globally. Although mouse models have been critical in advancing the knowledge of BC tumorigenesis and progression, human breast models comprising the breast tissue microenvironment are needed to help elucidate the underlying mechanisms of BC risk factors. As such, it is essential to identify an

Indexed as

3D culturebreast organoidscancermammary organoidsmatrix

Identifiers

PMID34805107
PMCPMC8602090
OpenAlexW3212736829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.