ArticleJournal of exercise rehabilitation2021
Bilateral counter movement jump, squat, and drop jump performances in deaf and normal-hearing volleyball players: a comparative study.
Article in Journal of exercise rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Battle of the Equations: A Systematic Review of Jump Height Calculations Using Force Platforms.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Pooled it
- Time-course of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) following multi-dimensional elastic band vs. heavy resistance exercise.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Physical performance predictors in youth breaststroke swimming: motor and biomotor diagnostic differences.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Beyond Jump Height: A Comparison of Concentric Variables in the Squat Jump, Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump for Athletic Profiling.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sports-Related Injuries in Deaf Competitive Squad Athletes-Results of a Retrospective Self-Assessment.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The reliability and validity of the balance tests in hearing-impaired athletes.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Deaf and non-deaf basketball and volleyball players' multi-faceted difference on repeated counter movement jump performances: Height, force and acceleration.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Center of pressure-based postural sway differences on parallel and single leg stance in Olympic deaf basketball and volleyball players.Journal of exercise rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since deaf athletes do not have any physical deficiencies, it is known that they can easily participate in sports competitions if their communication problems are resolved. This study aimed to compare the performances of olympic deaf and elite normal-hearing volleyball players in different jumping test protocols. A total of 26 male volleyball players participated in the study, comprised of 12 olympic level deaf and 14 elite level normal-hearing. Following anthropometric measurements, athletes performed bilateral counter movement, squat and drop jump tests on a force plate. Each test was performed 3 times with maximal effort separated by 45 seconds of passive recovery and the mean of the three trials was selected for analysis. Independent Samples
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.