Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34804822›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021

China county-based prostate specific antigen screening for prostate cancer and a cost-effective analysis.

Zhiguo Zhang, Guoshu Liang, Peng Zhang, Zhongqi Zhao, Zhongnan He, Fengzhen Luo, Zhenqing Chen, Zongke Yang, Zhijie Zhang, Tao Xia and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiguo Zhang *Department of Urology, Liuyang People's Hospital, Liuyang, China.
Guoshu Liang *Department of Urology, Guanghan People's Hospital, Guanghan, China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of Urology, Xinmi Hospital of T.C.M, Xinmi, China.
Zhongqi ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Pucheng County Hospital, Weinan, China.
Zhongnan HeDepartment of Urology, Ruichang People's Hospital, Ruichang, China.
Fengzhen LuoDepartment of Urology, The People's Hospital of Yudu County, Ganzhou, China.
Zhenqing ChenDepartment of Urology, Xunxian People's Hospital, Hebi, China.
Zongke YangDepartment of Urology, Dianjiang People's Hospital, Dianjiang, China.
Zhijie ZhangDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, China.
Tao XiaDepartment of Urology, Chengcheng County Hospital, Weinan, China.
Xin LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Linzhou People's Hospital, Linzhou, China.
Yong ZhangDepartment of Urology, Liuyang People's Hospital, Liuyang, China.
Wei YeDepartment of Urology, Guanghan People's Hospital, Guanghan, China.
Liuyang City Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNQinhuangdao Second Hospital · CNLinzhou Cancer Hospital · CNQujiang People's Hospital · CNRuian People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, and is the third-leading cause of cancer death in men. Nearly 70% of new prostate cancer patients in China are locally advanced or widely metastatic with poor prognosis. Providing active treatment to early stage prostate cancer patients can improve the prognosis of prostate cancer patients. Thus, this study sought to evaluate the economy of early prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening for high-risk prostate cancer.

methodsBased on the data collected from the PSA screening activities of 11 county hospitals from October 2019 to April 2021, this study evaluated a high-risk prostate cancer population who received PSA screening and their quality of life and economy. The screening population comprised males aged over 50 years. All screening patients were tested for PSA. If the PSA value is unnormal, a further diagnosis based on magnetic resonance imagining (MRI) or a transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy were performed. The decision-tree and Markov model was used to simulate the process of disease development of high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent screenings and those who did not, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was also evaluated.

resultsA total of 13,726 men received a PSA screening. Of these, 1,062 men had abnormal PSA values, and 73 of these were diagnosed with prostate cancer. Of these 73 patients, 40, 21, and 12 had early stage, mid-stage, and late-stage prostate cancer, respectively. Compared to the patients unscreened, the 1,000 patients who received an early PSA screening increased their quality-adjusted life year (QALY) by 15.69 years; however, each QALY had an additional cost of 38,550 yuan, which was lower than the willingness to pay threshold of 72,447 yuan (per capita gross domestic product in 2020).

conclusionsFor high-risk prostate cancer patients, early screenings have a cost-effective advantage over no screenings. Thus, early screening should be vigorously promoted for high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Indexed as

Chinacost-effectiveness analysisProstate cancerscreening

Identifiers

PMID34804822
PMCPMC8575585
OpenAlexW3210427906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.