Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34804806›Full record

ArticleComparative migration studies2021

Towards a typology of social protection for migrants and refugees in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Marcia Vera Espinoza, Victoria Prieto Rosas, Gisela P Zapata, Luciana Gandini, Alethia Fernández de la Reguera, Gioconda Herrera, Stephanie López Villamil, Cristina María Zamora Gómez, Cécile Blouin, Camila Montiel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative migration studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Forms of Aid Provided to Refugees of the 2022 Russia-Ukraine War: The Case of Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Marcia Vera EspinozaSchool of Geography, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Rd., London, E1 4NS UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6238-7683
Victoria Prieto RosasPrograma de Población, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Constituyente 1502, CP 11100 Montevideo, Uruguay.
Gisela P ZapataCentro de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento Regional (CEDEPLAR), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901 Brazil.
Luciana GandiniInstituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito, Mario de La Cueva s/n, C.U., Coyoacán, 04510 Mexico City, CDMX Mexico.
Alethia Fernández de la RegueraInstituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito, Mario de La Cueva s/n, C.U., Coyoacán, 04510 Mexico City, CDMX Mexico.
Gioconda HerreraDepartamento de Sociología y Estudios de Género, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, FLACSO Ecuador, Calle La Pradera E7-174 y Av. Diego de Almagro, Quito, Ecuador.
Stephanie López VillamilFacultad de Derecho, Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ciudad Universitaria, Bogotá, Colombia.
Cristina María Zamora GómezDpto. Derecho Internacional Público y Relaciones Internacionales, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. La Enramadilla, 18-20, CP 41018 Seville, Spain.
Cécile BlouinPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP), Avenida Universitaria 1801, San Miguel, Lima, Peru.
Camila MontielPrograma de Población, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Constituyente 1502, CP 11100 Montevideo, Uruguay.
Gabriela Cabezas GálvezDepartamento de Sociología y Estudios de Género, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, FLACSO Ecuador, Calle La Pradera E7-174 y Av. Diego de Almagro, Quito, Ecuador.
Irene PallaInstituto de Democracia y Derechos Humanos, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (IDEHPUCP), Calle Tomás Ramsey 925, Magdalena, Lima, Peru.
Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Ecuador · ECPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú · PEUniversidad de la República de Uruguay · UYUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidad Internacional · MXUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 health crisis has put to the test Latin America's already precarious social protection systems. This paper comparatively examines what type of social protection has been provided, by whom, and to what extent migrant and refugee populations have been included in these programmes in seven countries of the region during the COVID-19 pandemic, between March and December 2020. We develop a typology of models of social protection highlighting the assemblages of actors, different modes of protection and the emerging migrants' subjectification in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay in relation to Non-Contributory Social Transfer (NCST) programmes and other actions undertaken by state and non-state actors. The analysis is based on 85 semi-structured interviews with representatives of national and local governments, International Organisations, Civil Society Organisations, and migrant-led organisations across 16 cities, and a systematic review of regulatory frameworks in the country-case studies. The proposed typology shows broad heterogeneity and complexity regarding different degrees of inclusion of migrant and refugee populations, particularly in pre-existing and new NCST programmes. These actions are furthering notions of migrant protection that are contingent and crisis-driven, imposing temporal limitations that often selectively exclude migrants based on legal status. It also brings to the fore the path-dependent nature of policies and practices of exclusion/inclusion in the region, which impact on migrants' effective access to social and economic rights, while shaping the broader dynamics of migration governance in the region.

Indexed as

Covid-19ExclusionInclusionLatin AmericaMigrantsMigration governanceMigration policyRefugeesSocial protection

Identifiers

PMID34804806
PMCPMC8592668
OpenAlexW3214640262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.