ArticleLeukemia research reports2021
Promising remissions in relapsed refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients requiring multiple salvage regimens before transplantation in the brentuximab vedotin era.
Article in Leukemia research reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- ROLE OF AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION IN RELAPSED/ REFRACTORY HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA: RETROSPECTIVE DATA FROM A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN INDIA.Blood cell therapy · 2025Article
- Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma from Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and South Africa: Subgroup Analysis from the International Multicenter Retrospective B-HOLISTIC StudyTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL) patients refractory to first line salvage have poor outcomes. Herein we report the outcome of R/R cHL patients requiring ≥two vs. one line in the era of chemo-immunotherapy. Among 55 R/R cHL patients, 33 (60%) required one, 22 (40%) required ≥two lines. At 2 years, the estimated PFS and OS for patients requiring one vs. ≥two lines was 71.2% (50.1-84.7) vs. 51.9% (27.6-71.6),
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.