Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34804735›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Recognizing the Vulnerable: Perspectives, Attitudes, and Interests of Women With Uterine Factor Infertility Towards Uterus Allotransplantation.

Helen Xun, Darya Fadavi, Halley Darrach, Nicole Fischer, Pooja Yesantharao, Franca Kraenzlin, Amanda Nickles Fader, James H Segars, Justin M Sacks

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Helen XunDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Darya FadaviDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Halley DarrachDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Nicole FischerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Pooja YesantharaoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Franca KraenzlinDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Amanda Nickles FaderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
James H SegarsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Justin M SacksDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, USA.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USSt. Louis Children's Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUterine allotransplantation (UTx) is a novel therapy to allow women with uterine factor infertility (UFI) to bear their own children. To date, over 60 UTx have been performed, resulting in 15 live births. Our study investigates the attitudes, perspectives, and interests of women with UFI towards UTx.

methodsAnonymous questionnaires were distributed electronically to women diagnosed with UFI at Johns Hopkins Hospital between the years 2003 and 2018.

resultsThirty-one women with UFI were identified, resulting in 10 completed surveys. The average age was 31.7 ± 6.31 years, and the average age of diagnosis was 20 years (range 14-31); all 10 surveyed women had congenital UFI. Of note, 80% of women agreed that UTx should be an option for women with UFI, and 90% would consider receiving a UTx. The majority of the nine (90%) women who had previously heard of UTx learned about it from the news (5, 50%). When asked to rank the risks related to UTx in order of personal importance, only two women ranked themselves most important; the other woman ranked fetus and donor as more important. All women had health insurance (70% had private insurance), and 90% believed that UTx should be covered by health insurance.

conclusionsWe surveyed women with UFI and found that the majority are willing to have UTx, despite the associated risks of the procedure. Taking into consideration the responses for ranking the importance of risks of the procedure, women with UFI should be considered a vulnerable population, requiring special considerations for UTx informed consents.

Indexed as

fertilitylive birthmayer–rokitansky–küster–hauser syndromeplastic surgeryreproductionreproductive healthsurveytransplantuterine factor infertilityuterus allotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID34804735
PMCPMC8599396
OpenAlexW3205521246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.